» Articles » PMID: 30794212

Is a Modular Pedicle-hemipelvic Endoprosthesis Durable at Short Term in Patients Undergoing Enneking Type I + II Tumor Resections With or Without Sacroiliac Involvement?

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Feb 23
PMID 30794212
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Functional reconstruction after Enneking Type I + II resections of the pelvis (those involving both the ilium and the acetabulum) is challenging, especially if resection of part of the sacrum is included. To assess the clinical outcomes of a newly designed modular pedicle-hemipelvic endoprosthesis, we performed a preliminary retrospective study on its clinical use in a small group of patients.

Questions/purposes: The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate in a small case series whether the new endoprosthesis restored lower limb function and lumbopelvic stability in the short term; (2) to identify the complications associated with use of the new prosthesis; and (3) to assess the 5-year cumulative survival, the cumulative incidence of a major postoperative event, and the cumulative incidence of implant failure in this group of patients.

Methods: Between August 2012 and August 2014, our center performed 274 internal hemipelvectomies for oncologic indications. Among these, 20 were treated with the new endoprosthesis, which was designed for fixation both to the residual sacrum as well as the lumbar spine. An earlier version of the device had been removed from the market because of an unacceptable risk of serious complications. All of the 20 tumors were sarcomas necessitating en bloc resection. The implant is modular and can meet the different-sized defects in each patient. The general indication for use of the new implant was a total acetabular defect with extensive iliac involvement or total loss of the sacroiliac joint and/or hemisacrum. All 20 patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months or until death in those patients who survived < 2 years (median, 36 months; range, 6-60 months). The clinical data were retrieved from the database and the study endpoints (function according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS] score, complications, and survivorship of patients and implants) were ascertained by chart review. Lumbopelvic stability was defined as an excellent or good rating according to the International Society of Limb Salvage radiologic implant evaluation system. The cumulative survival of patients was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. The cumulative incidence of major postoperative events including local recurrence, metastasis, and reoperation was estimated using a competing events analysis; the cumulative incidence of implant failure, including mechanical failure or deep infection, in patients who underwent reoperation was also estimated using a competing events analysis.

Results: In the 16 patients who survived > 12 months, the median MSTS score was 19 of 30 (range, 5-26). Radiographic assessments demonstrated lumbopelvic stability in all of the 16 patients. Twelve of 20 patients developed postoperative complications, primarily including deep infection (one), hip dislocation (two), and local recurrence (three). Major revision surgery was performed in five of 20 patients. The estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier patient survival rate was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-79%), whereas the cumulative incidence of major postoperative events and implant failure using the competing risk estimator was 42% (95% CI, 23%-60%) and 15% (95% CI, 4%-34%) at 5 years, respectively.

Conclusions: Preliminary results with hemipelvic reconstruction using this new endoprosthesis achieved fair functional results and the complications that were observed appeared comparable to other reconstruction options at short-term followup. Longer-term surveillance is called for to see whether this implant will be durable compared with other available reconstructive alternatives such as a custom-made megaendoprosthesis or an autograft/allograft-prosthetic composite.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Citing Articles

3D-Printed Prosthesis with an Articular Interface for Anatomical Acetabular Reconstruction After Type I + II (+ III) Internal Hemipelvectomy: Clinical Outcomes and Finite Element Analysis.

Huang X, Huang D, Lin N, Yan X, Qu H, Ye Z J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024; 107(2):184-195.

PMID: 39729975 PMC: 11717430. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01462.


Reconstruction of Internal Hemipelvectomy Defects After Oncologic Resection.

Vaynrub M, Healey J, Morris C, Shahzad F J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024; 33(3):e124-e135.

PMID: 39241189 PMC: 11747889. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00502.


Novel positioning guiders accurately assist in situ acetabular reconstruction for patients undergoing pelvic bone tumor resection.

Huang D, Chen Z, Yan X, Huang X, Liu M, Yao Z Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(6):2963-2972.

PMID: 38836905 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04020-7.


Biomimetic design and clinical application of Ti-6Al-4V lattice hemipelvis prosthesis for pelvic reconstruction.

Li Z, Luo Y, Lu M, Wang Y, Gong T, He X J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):210.

PMID: 38561755 PMC: 10983619. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04672-5.


Palliative Treatment for the Management of Advanced Pelvic Hydatid Bone Disease.

Luan H, Liu K, Tian Q, Chen Y, Peng C, Sun X Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023; 109(3):645-649.

PMID: 37524327 PMC: 10484271. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0267.


References
1.
ENNEKING W, Dunham W . Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(6):731-46. View

2.
Donati D, Di Bella C, Frisoni T, Cevolani L, DeGroot H . Alloprosthetic composite is a suitable reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(5):1450-8. PMC: 3069274. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1799-9. View

3.
Kawai A, Healey J, Boland P, Lin P, Huvos A, Meyers P . Prognostic factors for patients with sarcomas of the pelvic bones. Cancer. 1998; 82(5):851-9. View

4.
Ozaki T, Hoffmann C, Hillmann A, Gosheger G, Lindner N, Winkelmann W . Implantation of hemipelvic prosthesis after resection of sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (396):197-205. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200203000-00030. View

5.
Wafa H, Grimer R, Jeys L, Abudu A, Carter S, Tillman R . The use of extracorporeally irradiated autografts in pelvic reconstruction following tumour resection. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(10):1404-10. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.33470. View