» Articles » PMID: 30794145

Limitation of Life-Sustaining Care in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview
Journal J Hosp Med
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Feb 23
PMID 30794145
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When life-sustaining treatments (LST) are no longer effective or consistent with patient preferences, limitations may be set so that LSTs are withdrawn or withheld from the patient. Many studies have examined the frequency of limitations of LST in intensive care unit (ICU) settings in the past 30 years. This systematic review describes variation and patient characteristics associated with limitations of LST in critically ill patients in all types of ICUs in the United States. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed by a medical librarian between December 2014 and April 2017. A total of 1,882 unique titles and abstracts were reviewed, 113 were selected for article review, and 36 studies were fully reviewed. Patient factors associated with an increased likelihood of limiting LST included white race, older age, female sex, poor preadmission functional status, multiple comorbidities, and worse illness severity score. Based on several large, multicenter studies, there was a trend toward a higher frequency of limitation of LST over time. However, there is large variability between ICUs in the proportion of patients with limitations and on the proportion of deaths preceded by a limitation. Increases in the frequency of limitations of LST over time suggests changing attitudes about aggressive end-of-life-care. Limitations are more common for patients with worse premorbid health and greater ICU illness severity. While some differences in the frequency of limitations of LST may be explained by personal factors such as race, there is unexplained wide variability between units.

Citing Articles

ICU Admission Preferences in the Hypothetical Event of Acute Critical Illness: A Survey of Very Old Norwegians and Their Next-of-Kins.

Schwarz G, Skaar E, Miljeteig I, Hufthammer K, Burns K, Kvale R Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(12):e1185.

PMID: 39652434 PMC: 11630954. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001185.


Why Are Men More Restrained in the Intensive Care Unit?.

Modra L, Casamento A Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024; 21(12):1657-1658.

PMID: 39601504 PMC: 11622828. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1025ED.


Navigating shared decision-making after the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act: a qualitative study of in-depth interviews with terminal cancer patients, families, and healthcare professionals.

Yu S, Lee Y, Shin S, Woo G, Kim D, Kwon J Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(12):796.

PMID: 39549104 PMC: 11568970. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08975-5.


Differences between women and men in prolonged weaning.

Roser E, Michels-Zetsche J, Ersoz H, Neetz B, Hoger P, Trinkmann F Respir Res. 2024; 25(1):363.

PMID: 39379950 PMC: 11460207. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-03002-x.


Limitations of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Croatia: a multicenter retrospective study.

Spoljar D, Radonic R, Poljakovic Z, Nesek V, Vucic M, Persec J Croat Med J. 2024; 65(4):373-382.

PMID: 39219200 PMC: 11399720.


References
1.
Mayer S, Kossoff S . Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology. 1999; 52(8):1602-9. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.52.8.1602. View

2.
Diringer M, Edwards D, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H . Factors associated with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(9):1792-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200109000-00023. View

3.
Kish Wallace S, Martin C, Shaw A, Price K . Influence of an advance directive on the initiation of life support technology in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care Med. 2002; 29(12):2294-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00010. View

4.
Plaisier B, Blostein P, Hurt K, Malangoni M . Withholding/withdrawal of life support in trauma patients: is there an age bias?. Am Surg. 2002; 68(2):159-62. View

5.
Hamel M, Phillips R, Teno J, Davis R, Goldman L, Lynn J . Cost effectiveness of aggressive care for patients with nontraumatic coma. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(6):1191-6. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00002. View