» Articles » PMID: 30793193

Does Fertilization Explain the Extraordinary Hydraulic Behaviour of Apple Trees?

Overview
Journal J Exp Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Feb 23
PMID 30793193
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fertilization of woody plants plays a central role in agriculture and forestry, but little is known about how plant water relations are thereby affected. Here we investigated the impact of fertilization on tree hydraulics, and xylem and pit anatomy in the high-yield apple cultivars Golden and Red Delicious. In fertilized trees of Golden Delicious, specific hydraulic conductivity of branch xylem, hydraulic conductance of the root system, and maximum stomatal conductance increased considerably. In Red Delicious, differences between fertilized and control trees were less pronounced. In both cultivars, xylem embolism resistance of fertilized trees was significantly lower and stomatal closure occurred at lower water potentials. Furthermore, water potential at turgor loss point and osmotic potential at full saturation were higher and cell wall elasticity was lower in fertilized plants, suggesting reduced drought tolerance of leaves. Anatomical differences were observed regarding conduit diameters, cell wall reinforcement, pit membrane thickness, pit chamber depth, and stomatal pore length, with more pronounced differences in Golden Delicious. The findings reveal altered hydraulic behaviour in both apple cultivars upon fertilization. The increased vulnerability to hydraulic failure might pose a considerable risk for apple productivity under a changing climate, which should be considered for future cultivation and management practices.

Citing Articles

New insights into a sensitive life stage: hydraulics of tree seedlings in their first growing season.

Beikircher B, Held M, Losso A, Mayr S New Phytol. 2024; 245(2):577-590.

PMID: 39501601 PMC: 11655438. DOI: 10.1111/nph.20243.


Quantifying the grapevine xylem embolism resistance spectrum to identify varieties and regions at risk in a future dry climate.

Lamarque L, Delmas C, Charrier G, Burlett R, DellAcqua N, Pouzoulet J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7724.

PMID: 37173393 PMC: 10181993. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34224-6.


Applying Plant Hydraulic Physiology Methods to Investigate Desiccation During Prolonged Cold Storage of Horticultural Trees.

Sheridan R, Nackley L Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:818769.

PMID: 35283873 PMC: 8908214. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.818769.


Limited Phenotypic Variation in Vulnerability to Cavitation and Stomatal Sensitivity to Vapor Pressure Deficit among Clones of from Different Climatic Origins.

Yanez M, Urzua J, Espinoza S, Pena V Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(9).

PMID: 34579309 PMC: 8469263. DOI: 10.3390/plants10091777.


Higher water and nutrient use efficiencies in savanna than in rainforest lianas result in no difference in photosynthesis.

Zhang Y, Yang D, Zhang K, Bai X, Wang Y, Wu H Tree Physiol. 2021; 42(1):145-159.

PMID: 34312678 PMC: 8755031. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpab099.


References
1.
Domec J, Johnson D . Does homeostasis or disturbance of homeostasis in minimum leaf water potential explain the isohydric versus anisohydric behavior of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars?. Tree Physiol. 2012; 32(3):245-8. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps013. View

2.
Choat B, Cobb A, Jansen S . Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytol. 2007; 177(3):608-626. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02317.x. View

3.
Beikircher B, Mayr S . The hydraulic architecture of Juniperus communis L. ssp. communis: shrubs and trees compared. Plant Cell Environ. 2008; 31(11):1545-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01860.x. View

4.
Nardini A, Salleo S, Jansen S . More than just a vulnerable pipeline: xylem physiology in the light of ion-mediated regulation of plant water transport. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62(14):4701-18. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err208. View

5.
Bartlett M, Scoffoni C, Sack L . The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2012; 15(5):393-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x. View