» Articles » PMID: 30792906

Implementing TMB Measurement in Clinical Practice: Considerations on Assay Requirements

Overview
Journal ESMO Open
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Feb 23
PMID 30792906
Citations 170
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical evidence demonstrates that treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy agents can have considerable benefit across multiple tumours. However, there is a need for the development of predictive biomarkers that identify patients who are most likely to respond to immunotherapy. Comprehensive characterisation of tumours using genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic approaches continues to lead the way in advancing precision medicine. Genetic correlates of response to therapy have been known for some time, but recent clinical evidence has strengthened the significance of high tumour mutational burden (TMB) as a biomarker of response and hence a rational target for immunotherapy. Concordantly, immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed clinical practice for lung cancer and melanoma, which are tumour types with some of the highest mutational burdens. TMB is an implementable approach for molecular biology and/or pathology laboratories that provides a quantitative measure of the total number of mutations in tumour tissue of patients and can be assessed by whole genome, whole exome, or large targeted gene panel sequencing of biopsied material. Currently, TMB assessment is not standardised across research and clinical studies. As a biomarker that affects treatment decisions, it is essential to unify TMB assessment approaches to allow for reliable, comparable results across studies. When implementing TMB measurement assays, it is important to consider factors that may impact the method workflow, the results of the assay, and the interpretation of the data. Such factors include biopsy sample type, sample quality and quantity, genome coverage, sequencing platform, bioinformatic pipeline, and the definitions of the final threshold that determines high TMB. This review outlines the factors for adoption of TMB measurement into clinical practice, providing an understanding of TMB assay considerations throughout the sample journey, and suggests principles to effectively implement TMB assays in a clinical setting to aid and optimise treatment decisions.

Citing Articles

Discrepancies in PD-L1 expression, lymphocyte infiltration, and tumor mutational burden in non-small cell lung cancer and matched brain metastases.

Zhang Y, Cheng R, Ding T, Wu J Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025; 13(12):3590-3602.

PMID: 39830744 PMC: 11736585. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-735.


Solar elastosis correlates with high tumor mutation burden and better 5-year disease-specific survival in patients with stage II/III melanoma.

Lezcano C, Luo L, Shen R, Orlow I, Thomas N, Berwick M EJC Skin Cancer. 2025; 2.

PMID: 39801746 PMC: 11721741. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcskn.2024.100274.


Multicenter In-House Evaluation of an Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.

Jantus-Lewintre E, Rappa A, Ruano D, van Egmond D, Gallach S, Gozuyasli D Mol Diagn Ther. 2025; 29(2):249-261.

PMID: 39798063 PMC: 11860996. DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00766-2.


CASE (CemiplimAb-rwlc Survivorship and Epidemiology): a study in advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Park S, Ellison D, Weight R, Homsi J, Rabinowits G, Ruiz E Future Oncol. 2025; 21(4):431-436.

PMID: 39797702 PMC: 11812358. DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2448416.


Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling.

Ren L, Shi L, Zheng Y Phenomics. 2024; 4(5):487-521.

PMID: 39723231 PMC: 11666855. DOI: 10.1007/s43657-023-00153-7.


References
1.
Gilboa E . The makings of a tumor rejection antigen. Immunity. 1999; 11(3):263-70. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80101-6. View

2.
Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S . Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161(6):1961-71. PMC: 1850907. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64472-0. View

3.
Ng S, Turner E, Robertson P, Flygare S, Bigham A, Lee C . Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature. 2009; 461(7261):272-6. PMC: 2844771. DOI: 10.1038/nature08250. View

4.
Grizzle W . Special symposium: fixation and tissue processing models. Biotech Histochem. 2009; 84(5):185-93. PMC: 2891300. DOI: 10.3109/10520290903039052. View

5.
Robson M, Storm C, Weitzel J, Wollins D, Offit K . American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(5):893-901. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0660. View