» Articles » PMID: 30790025

Improved Prediction of Incident Vertebral Fractures Using Opportunistic QCT Compared to DXA

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Feb 22
PMID 30790025
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare opportunistic quantitative CT (QCT) with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their ability to predict incident vertebral fractures.

Methods: We included 84 patients aged 50 years and older, who had routine CT including the lumbar spine and DXA within a 12-month period (baseline) as well as follow-up imaging after at least 12 months or who sustained an incident vertebral fracture documented earlier. Patients with bone disorders aside from osteoporosis were excluded. Fracture status and trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively evaluated in baseline CT and fracture status was reassessed at follow-up. BMD was assessed by opportunistic QCT with asynchronous calibration of multiple MDCT scanners.

Results: Sixteen patients had incident vertebral fractures showing lower mean BMD than patients without fracture (p = 0.001). For the risk of incident vertebral fractures, the hazard ratio increased per SD in BMD (4.07; 95% CI, 1.98-8.38), as well as after adjusting for age, sex, and prevalent fractures (2.54; 95% CI, 1.09-5.90). For DXA, a statistically significant increase in relative hazard per SD decrease in T-score was only observed after age and sex adjustment (1.57; 95% CI, 1.04-2.38). The predictability of incident vertebral fractures was good by BMD (AUC = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89) and non-significant by T-scores. Asynchronously calibrated CT scanners showed good long-term stability (linear drift ranging from - 0.55 to - 2.29 HU per year).

Conclusions: Opportunistic screening of mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients in CT performed for indications other than densitometry allows for better risk assessment of imminent vertebral fractures than dedicated DXA.

Key Points: • Opportunistic QCT predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures better than DXA reference standard in mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients. • More than every second patient (56%) with an incident vertebral fracture was misdiagnosed not having osteoporosis according to DXA. • Standard ACR QCT-cutoff values for osteoporosis (< 80 mg/cm ) and osteopenia (≤ 120 mg/cm ) can also be applied scanner independently in calibrated opportunistic QCT.

Citing Articles

Undetected low bone mineral density in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery-prevalence and risk factors.

Kohli P, Hambrecht J, Zhu J, Chiapparelli E, Schonnagel L, Guven A N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100591.

PMID: 40041543 PMC: 11876750. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100591.


Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in intraoperative CT can accurately identify patients with low volumetric bone mineral density and osteoporosis during spine surgery.

Ruhling S, Petzsche M, Loffler M, Sollmann N, Baum T, Bodden J Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39912947 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08697-0.


Cervicothoracic volumetric bone mineral density assessed by opportunistic QCT may be a reliable marker for osteoporosis in adults.

Ramschutz C, Sollmann N, El Husseini M, Kupfer K, Paprottka K, Loffler M Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(3):423-433.

PMID: 39738830 PMC: 11882693. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07373-1.


Assessment of trabecular bone Hounsfield units in the lumbar spine for osteoporosis evaluation in individuals aged 65 and above: a review.

Alharthy A Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(2):225-233.

PMID: 39738829 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07340-w.


Radiomics models based on thoracic and upper lumbar spine in chest LDCT to predict low bone mineral density.

Pan Y, Wan Y, Wu Y, Lin C, Ye Q, Liu J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31323.

PMID: 39732811 PMC: 11682441. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82642-x.


References
1.
Wang L, Su Y, Wang Q, Duanmu Y, Yang M, Yi C . Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):6284. PMC: 5524691. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y. View

2.
Genant H, Wu C, van Kuijk C, Nevitt M . Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993; 8(9):1137-48. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915. View

3.
Li Y, Wong K, Law M, Fang B, Lau V, Vardhanabuti V . Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis in abdominal computed tomography for Chinese population. Arch Osteoporos. 2018; 13(1):76. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0492-y. View

4.
Kanis J . Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4(6):368-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF01622200. View

5.
Engelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, Qin L, Zysset P, Leslie W . Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Advanced Techniques in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part III. J Clin Densitom. 2015; 18(3):393-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.010. View