» Articles » PMID: 30789763

Paradoxical Impact of a Patient-Handling Intervention on Injury Rate Disparity Among Hospital Workers

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Feb 22
PMID 30789763
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To test whether a comprehensive safe patient-handling intervention, which successfully reduced overall injury rates among hospital workers in a prior study, was differentially effective for higher-wage workers (nurses) versus low-wage workers (patient care associates [PCAs]).

Methods: Data were from a cohort of nurses and PCAs at 2 large hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. One hospital received the intervention in 2013; the other did not. Using longitudinal survey data from 2012 and 2014 plus longitudinal administrative injury and payroll data, we tested for socioeconomic differences in changes in self-reported safe patient-handling practices, and for socioeconomic differences in changes in injury rates using administrative data.

Results: After the intervention, improvements in self-reported patient-handling practices were equivalent for PCAs and for nurses. However, in administrative data, lifting and exertion injuries decreased among nurses (rate ratio [RR] = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41, 1.00) but not PCAs (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.74,1.63; P for occupation × intervention interaction = 0.02).

Conclusions: Although the population-level injury rate decreased after the intervention, most improvements were among higher-wage workers, widening the socioeconomic gap in injury and exemplifying the inequality paradox. Results have implications for public health intervention development, implementation, and analysis.

Citing Articles

Barriers and Facilitators for the Use of Patient Lifts by Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review.

Khairallah G, Mowafi H, Al-Hajj S, Brackett A, Sakr C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12).

PMID: 39767498 PMC: 11675142. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121659.


Patient handling training interventions and musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kugler H, Taylor N, Brusco N Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e24937.

PMID: 38371982 PMC: 10873653. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24937.


The relationship of occupational injury and use of mental health care.

Lopez Gomez M, Williams J, Boden L, Sorensen G, Hopcia K, Hashimoto D J Safety Res. 2020; 74:227-232.

PMID: 32951787 PMC: 10868658. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.004.


Literature Review of Policy Implications From Findings of the Center for Work, Health, and Well-being.

Lopez Gomez M, Sparer-Fine E, Sorensen G, Wagner G J Occup Environ Med. 2019; 61(11):868-876.

PMID: 31453894 PMC: 6842102. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001686.

References
1.
Andersen L, Burdorf A, Fallentin N, Persson R, Jakobsen M, Mortensen O . Patient transfers and assistive devices: prospective cohort study on the risk for occupational back injury among healthcare workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013; 40(1):74-81. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3382. View

2.
Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

3.
Sabbath E, Sparer E, Boden L, Wagner G, Hashimoto D, Hopcia K . Preventive care utilization: Association with individual- and workgroup-level policy and practice perceptions. Prev Med. 2018; 111:235-240. PMC: 6028933. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.013. View

4.
Federico B, Costa G, Kunst A . Educational inequalities in initiation, cessation, and prevalence of smoking among 3 Italian birth cohorts. Am J Public Health. 2006; 97(5):838-45. PMC: 1854860. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067082. View

5.
Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G . Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987; 18(3):233-7. DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. View