» Articles » PMID: 30789654

Genetic Variation in Residual Feed Intake is Associated with Body Composition, Behavior, Rumen, Heat Production, Hematology, and Immune Competence Traits in Angus Cattle1

Overview
Journal J Anim Sci
Date 2019 Feb 22
PMID 30789654
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This experiment was to evaluate a suite of biological traits likely to be associated with genetic variation in residual feed intake (RFI) in Angus cattle. Twenty nine steers and 30 heifers bred to be divergent in postweaning RFI (RFIp) and that differed in midparent RFIp-EBV (RFIp-EBVmp) by more than 2 kg DMI/d were used in this study. A 1-unit (1 kg DM/d) decrease in RFIp-EBVmp was accompanied by a 0.08 kg (SE = 0.03; P < 0.05) increase in ADG, a 0.58 kg/d (0.17; P < 0.01) decrease in DMI, a 0.89 kg/kg (0.22; P < 0.001) decrease in FCR, and a 0.62 kg/d (0.12; P < 0.001) decrease in feedlot RFI (RFIf). Ultrasonically scanned depths of subcutaneous fat at the rib and rump sites, measured at the start and end of the RFI test, all had strong positive correlations with RFIp-EBVmp, DMI, and RFIf (all r values ≥0.5 and P < 0.001). Variation in RFIp-EBVmp was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with flight speed (r = -0.32), number of visits to feed bins (r = 0.45), and visits to exhaled-emission monitors (r = -0.27), as well as the concentrations of propionate (r = -0.32) and valerate (r = -0.31) in rumen fluid, white blood cell (r = -0.51), lymphocyte (r = -0.43), and neutrophil (r = -0.31) counts in blood. RFIp-EBVmp was also correlated with the cellular immune response to vaccination (r = 0.25; P < 0.1) and heat production in fasted cattle (r = -0.46; P < 0.001). Traits that explained significant variation (P < 0.05) in DMI over the RFI test were midtest metabolic-BW (44.7%), rib fat depth at the end of test (an additional 18%), number of feeder visits (additional 5.7%), apparent digestibility of the ration by animals (additional 2.4%) and white blood-cell count (2.1%), and the cellular immune response to vaccine injection (additional 1.1%; P < 0.1), leaving ~23% of the variation in DMI unexplained. The same traits (BW excluded) explained 33%, 12%, 3.6%, 3.7%, and 3.1%, and together explained 57% of the variation in RFIf. This experiment showed that genetic variation in RFI was accompanied by variation in estimated body composition, behavior, rumen, fasted heat production, hematology, and immune competence traits, and that variation in feedlot DMI and RFIf was due to differences in BW, scanned fatness, and many other factors in these cattle fed ad libitum and able to display any innate differences in appetite, temperament, feeding behavior, and activity.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Linkage Between Ruminal Microbial Communities on Postweaning and Finishing Diets and Their Relation to Residual Feed Intake in Beef Cattle.

Peraza P, Fernandez-Calero T, Naya H, Sotelo-Silveira J, Navajas E Microorganisms. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39770639 PMC: 11676184. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122437.


Association of genomically enhanced residual feed intake with performance, feed efficiency, feeding behavior, gas flux, and nutrient digestibility in growing Holstein heifers.

OReilly K, Carstens G, Johnson J, Deeb N, Ross P J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 39360624 PMC: 11525487. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae289.


Effects of GH L127V and TG5 C422T polymorphisms on the hormonal profile, slaughter traits, and meat quality of Hereford bulls.

Dzhulamanov K, Gerasimov N Vet World. 2024; 17(8):1920-1927.

PMID: 39328461 PMC: 11422643. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1920-1927.


Haematological values in cattle reared in humid and subhumid tropics of Mexico.

Gonzalez-Garduno R, Zaragoza-Vera C, Chay-Canul A, Flores-Santiago E Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023; 55(4):251.

PMID: 37378872 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-023-03664-7.


Identification of biomarkers associated with the feed efficiency by metabolomics profiling: results from the broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content.

Su Z, Bai X, Wang H, Wang S, Chen C, Xiao F J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2022; 13(1):122.

PMID: 36352447 PMC: 9647982. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-022-00775-3.


References
1.
Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Abo-Ismail M, Carstens G, Guan L, Hegarty R, Kenny D . Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle. Animal. 2018; 12(s2):s321-s335. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118001489. View

2.
Cafe L, Robinson D, Ferguson D, McIntyre B, Geesink G, Greenwood P . Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. J Anim Sci. 2010; 89(5):1452-65. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3304. View

3.
Nkrumah J, Crews Jr D, Basarab J, Price M, Okine E, Wang Z . Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2007; 85(10):2382-90. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-657. View

4.
Stoop C, Thompson-Crispi K, Cartwright S, Mallard B . Short communication: Variation in production parameters among Canadian Holstein cows classified as high, average, and low immune responders. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(6):4870-4874. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10145. View

5.
Torres-Vazquez J, van der Werf J, Clark S . Genetic and phenotypic associations of feed efficiency with growth and carcass traits in Australian Angus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2018; 96(11):4521-4531. PMC: 6247841. DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky325. View