Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Activity During an Isometric Squat Between Strength-Matched Men and Women
Overview
Affiliations
The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine whether strength-matched men and women exhibit a different magnitude and ratio of leg muscle activity during a maximal voluntary isometric squat. The secondary purpose was to assess the effect of normalization method on differences in strength between men and women. Thirty-two men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) were successfully strength-matched (≤10% difference) by maximal force produced during an isometric squat (IS) when normalized to body weight. Subjects first performed a maximal isometric knee extension (IKE) and knee flexion (IKF) followed by the IS and muscle activity (EMG) was recorded for the vastus medialis (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF). Muscle activity during the IS was expressed relative to the maximums observed during the IKE and IKF (%EMG). The results indicate that VMO, VL, ST and BF %EMG were not significantly different ( > 0.05) between men and women during the IS (Men VMO = 136.7 ± 24.9%, Women VMO = 157.1 ± 59.8%, Men VL = 126.2 ± 38.2%, Women VL = 128.1 ± 35.5%, Men ST = 25.5 ± 13.6%, Women ST = 25.2 ± 21.8%, Men BF = 46.1 ± 26.0%, Women BF = 42.2 ± 24.8%). Furthermore, the VMO:VL and hamstring to quadriceps (H:Q) %EMG ratio were not significantly different between groups in the IS (Men VMO:VL = 1.15 ± 0.28, Women VMO:VL = 1.22 ± 0.26, Men H:Q = 0.28 ± 0.14, Women H:Q = 0.24 ± 0.20). This investigation indicates that the magnitude of muscle activity and the ratios examined are not significantly different between men and women in a maximal voluntary isometric squat when matched for normalized strength. Future investigations should consider subject strength and normalization procedures in the experimental design to elucidate possible sex differences in neuromuscular performance capabilities.
Kadlec D, Jordan M, Alderson J, Nimphius S J Strength Cond Res. 2024; 38(12):2079-2087.
PMID: 39186066 PMC: 11578057. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004923.
Distributed Wearable Ultrasound Sensors Predict Isometric Ground Reaction Force.
King E, Patwardhan S, Bashatah A, Magee M, Jones M, Wei Q Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(15).
PMID: 39124070 PMC: 11314925. DOI: 10.3390/s24155023.
van den Tillaar R, Bao Fredriksen A, Hegdahl Gundersen A, Nygaard Falch H PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308344.
PMID: 39110682 PMC: 11305552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308344.
Feigel E, Sterczala A, Krajewski K, Sekel N, Lovalekar M, Peterson P Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(9):1247-1259.
PMID: 38967991 PMC: 11369343. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12159.
Looney D, Potter A, Schafer E, Chapman C, Friedl K Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1406749.
PMID: 38957215 PMC: 11217602. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1406749.