» Articles » PMID: 30787648

The Proportion of Lower Limb Running Injuries by Gender, Anatomical Location and Specific Pathology: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Feb 22
PMID 30787648
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Running is associated with a higher risk of overuse injury than other forms of aerobic exercise such as walking, swimming and cycling. An accurate description of the proportion of running injuries per anatomical location and where possible, per specific pathology, for both genders is required. The aim of this review was to determine the proportion of lower limb running injuries by anatomical location and by specific pathology in male and female runners (≥800m - ≤ marathon). The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed for this review. A literature search was performed with no restriction on publication year in Web of Science, Scopus, Sport-Discus, PubMed, and CINAHL up to July 2017. Retrospective, cross-sectional, prospective and randomised-controlled studies which surveyed injury data in runners were included. 36 studies were included to report the overall proportion of injury per anatomical location. The overall proportion of injury by specific pathology was reported from 11 studies. The knee (28%), ankle-foot (26%) and shank (16%) accounted for the highest proportion of injury in male and female runners, although the proportion of knee injury was greater in women (40% 31%). Relative to women, men had a greater proportion of ankle-foot (26% 19%) and shank (21% 16%) injuries. Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS; 17%), Achilles tendinopathy (AT; 10%) and medial tibial stress syndrome (MTS; 8%) accounted for the highest proportion of specific pathologies recorded overall. There was insufficient data to sub-divide specific pathology between genders. The predominate injury in female runners is to the knee. Male runners have a more even distribution of injury between the knee, shank and ankle-foot complex. There are several methodological issues, which limit the interpretation of epidemiological data in running injury.

Citing Articles

Using Wearable Sensor Technology to Analyze Running Technique and Prospective Running-Related Injuries During United States Military Cadet Basic Training.

Weart A, Brown L, Florkiewicz E, Freisinger G, East K, Reilly N Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241309273.

PMID: 39944772 PMC: 11815808. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241309273.


Incidence and biomechanical risk factors for running-related injuries: A prospective cohort study.

Moreira P, Veras P, Oliveira T, Souza M, Catharino L, Borel W J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024; 57:102562.

PMID: 39502890 PMC: 11532757. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102562.


Can Foot Orthoses Benefit Symptomatic Runners? Mechanistic and Clinical Insights Through a Scoping Review.

Del Duchetto F, Dussault-Picard C, Gagnon M, Dixon P, Cherni Y Sports Med Open. 2024; 10(1):108.

PMID: 39365485 PMC: 11452579. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00774-w.


The Impact of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Tibial Bone Stress Injury Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Case Series.

Golden A, Hogan K, Morris J, Pickens B Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(9):1126-1137.

PMID: 39229454 PMC: 11368450. DOI: 10.26603/001c.122641.


Predictive Value of the KOJI AWARENESS Self-Evaluation System for Running Injuries in Elite Male Long-Distance Runners: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Murofushi K, Mitomo S, Hirohata K, Furuya H, Katagiri H, Kaneoka K Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(8):23259671241260517.

PMID: 39143987 PMC: 11322930. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241260517.


References
1.
Collins K, Wagner M, Peterson K, Storey M . Overuse injuries in triathletes. A study of the 1986 Seafair Triathlon. Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17(5):675-80. DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700515. View

2.
Salmon P, Goode N, Lenne M, Finch C, Cassell E . Injury causation in the great outdoors: A systems analysis of led outdoor activity injury incidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2013; 63:111-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.019. View

3.
Malisoux L, Chambon N, Urhausen A, Theisen D . Influence of the Heel-to-Toe Drop of Standard Cushioned Running Shoes on Injury Risk in Leisure-Time Runners: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 6-Month Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(11):2933-2940. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516654690. View

4.
Teixeira R, Lunardi A, da Silva R, Lopes A, Carvalho C . PREVALENCE OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN IN MARATHON RUNNERS WHO COMPETE AT THE ELITE LEVEL. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 11(1):126-31. PMC: 4739041. View

5.
van der Worp M, Ten Haaf D, van Cingel R, de Wijer A, Nijhuis-van Der Sanden M, Staal J . Injuries in runners; a systematic review on risk factors and sex differences. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0114937. PMC: 4338213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114937. View