Purpose:
Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) is currently the standard treatment for esophageal cancer (EC). In recent years, taxane-based chemotherapy has also been used and has shown good efficacy in EC. This study aims to investigate the advantages of taxane-based over FP chemotherapy, as well as discuss its drawbacks, in the treatment of EC.
Patients And Methods:
A literature search was done for studies comparing clinical outcomes between taxane-based and FP chemotherapy in EC. Pooled analyses were performed to compare the efficacy and grade 3/4 adverse events in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Subgroup analyses were also conducted in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Results:
Thirty-one studies with a total of 3,912 patients were included in the analysis. Better long-term survival was found in patients who received taxane-based NACT (progression-free survival (PFS): pooled HR=0.58, =0.0008; and overall survival (OS): pooled HR=0.50, <0.00001) and dCRT (PFS: pooled HR=0.75, <0.0001). In NACRT, taxane-based treatment and FP showed similar efficacy. In ESCC patients, taxane-based treatment showed better OS (NACT: pooled HR=0.57, =0.02; NACRT: pooled HR=0.51, =0.03; and dCRT: pooled HR=0.73, <0.0001) than FP chemotherapy. Furthermore, taxane-based therapy also showed a better short-term response (complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or pathologic complete response (pCR). However, taxane-based therapy was significantly correlated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea.
Conclusion:
Compared to FP, taxane-based therapy produced better clinical response and outcomes in EC patients receiving NACT or dCRT, and in all types of therapy in patients with ESCC. Taxane-based treatment is associated with more frequent toxicity.
Citing Articles
Multiple machine learning-based integrations of multi-omics data to identify molecular subtypes and construct a prognostic model for HNSCC.
Luo X, Li C, Qin G
Hereditas. 2025; 162(1):17.
PMID: 39910672
PMC: 11800565.
DOI: 10.1186/s41065-025-00380-0.
Retrospective analysis of disease characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with esophageal cancer across 14 surgically represented centers.
Lu Z, Geng M, Han Y, Cao J, Wang J, Liu T
Cancer Biol Med. 2025; 21(12.
PMID: 39831767
PMC: 11745092.
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0336.
Feasibility and Safety of PD-1 Blockades Among Elderly Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.
Bai M, Wang W, Deng T, Duan J, Ba Y
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024; 18:4135-4151.
PMID: 39308693
PMC: 11414636.
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S476457.
The significance of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial.
Zhu Q, Zhang C, Li Z, Ma T, Wang N, Liu W
Thorac Cancer. 2024; 15(28):2038-2048.
PMID: 39199003
PMC: 11444924.
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15424.
A propensity score-matched comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin-5FU and carboplatin-paclitaxel in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A Turkish oncology group study.
Gurler F, Tay F, Isleyen Z, Yerlikaya T, Hendem E, Akturk Esen S
Cancer Med. 2024; 13(14):e70002.
PMID: 39030808
PMC: 11257995.
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70002.
Drug Delivery Opportunities in Esophageal Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospects.
Sabatelle R, Colson Y, Sachdeva U, Grinstaff M
Mol Pharm. 2024; 21(7):3103-3120.
PMID: 38888089
PMC: 11331583.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00246.
Nomogram for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu G, Chen T, Zhang X, Hu B, Yu J
Cancer Med. 2024; 13(5):e7075.
PMID: 38477511
PMC: 10935883.
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7075.
Surgical intervention after neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: a narrative review.
Ke J, Xie Y, Liang J, Wang M, Lin W
J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(4):2261-2276.
PMID: 37197518
PMC: 10183507.
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-420.
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Taxanes Plus Platinum and Fluorouracil Plus Platinum in the First-Line Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao Y, Song R, Jia Y, Zhang X, Zhang S, Wu C
Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(9):6610-6627.
PMID: 36135088
PMC: 9497974.
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090519.
The Key Clinical Questions of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer-A Review.
Han D, Li B, Zhao Q, Sun H, Dong J, Hao S
Front Oncol. 2022; 12:890688.
PMID: 35912182
PMC: 9333126.
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.890688.
Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response-Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial.
Goodman K, Ou F, Hall N, Bekaii-Saab T, Fruth B, Twohy E
J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39(25):2803-2815.
PMID: 34077237
PMC: 8407649.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.03611.
Challenges and perspectives for immunotherapy in oesophageal cancer: A look to the future (Review).
Lampis A, Ratti M, Ghidini M, Mirchev M, Okuducu A, Valeri N
Int J Mol Med. 2021; 47(6).
PMID: 33846775
PMC: 8041478.
DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4930.
Regulation of MRE11A by UBQLN4 leads to cisplatin resistance in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Murakami T, Shoji Y, Nishi T, Chang S, Jachimowicz R, Hoshimoto S
Mol Oncol. 2021; 15(4):1069-1087.
PMID: 33605536
PMC: 8024730.
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12929.
Comparison of a Concurrent Fluorouracil-Based Regimen and a Taxane-Based Regimen Combined with Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Huang C, Huang D, Zhu Y, Xie G, Wang H, Shi J
Transl Oncol. 2020; 13(3):100736.
PMID: 32092670
PMC: 7036422.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.12.008.