» Articles » PMID: 30786005

In Vivo Prediction of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Thickness and Position Changes for Different Jaw Positions

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 2019 Feb 21
PMID 30786005
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) are common dysfunctions of the masticatory region and are often linked to dislocation or changes of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for TMJ imaging but standard clinical sequences do not deliver a sufficient resolution and contrast for the creation of detailed meshes of the TMJ disc. Additionally, bony structures cannot be captured appropriately using standard MRI sequences due to their low signal intensity. The objective of this study was to enable researchers to create high resolution representations of all structures of the TMJ and consequently investigate morphological as well as positional changes of the masticatory system. To create meshes of the bony structures, a single computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired. In addition, a high-resolution MRI sequence was produced, which is used to collect the thickness and position change of the disc for various static postures using bite blocks. Changes in thickness of the TMJ disc as well as disc translation were measured. The newly developed workflow successfully allows researchers to create high resolution models of all structures of the TMJ for various static positions, enabling the investigation of TMJ disc translation and deformation. Discs were thinnest in the lateral part and moved mainly anteriorly and slightly medially. The procedure offers the most comprehensive picture of disc positioning and thickness changes reported to date. The presented data can be used for the development of a biomechanical computer model of TMJ anatomy and to investigate dynamic and static loads on the components of the system, which could be useful for the prediction of TMD onset.

Citing Articles

Associations between condylar height relative to occlusal plane and condylar osseous condition and TMJ loading based on 3D measurements and finite element analysis.

Gong Y, Zhu J, Zheng F, Zhu Y, Sui S, Liu Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28919.

PMID: 39572697 PMC: 11582652. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80442-x.


Computational Biomechanics of Sleep: A Systematic Mapping Review.

Cheng E, Lai D, Mao Y, Lee T, Lam W, Cheung J Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37627802 PMC: 10451553. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080917.


The effect of tooth cusp morphology and grinding direction on TMJ loading during bruxism.

Sagl B, Schmid-Schwap M, Piehslinger E, Rausch-Fan X, Stavness I Front Physiol. 2022; 13:964930.

PMID: 36187792 PMC: 9521318. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.964930.


Effect of facet inclination and location on TMJ loading during bruxism: An study.

Sagl B, Schmid-Schwap M, Piehslinger E, Kundi M, Stavness I J Adv Res. 2022; 35:25-32.

PMID: 35024193 PMC: 8721353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.04.009.


A simple graded bite block for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint.

Szopinski K, Regulski P Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021; 51(1):20210119.

PMID: 34233511 PMC: 8693330. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20210119.


References
1.
Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, Kartha K, Ohrbach R, Truelove E . Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107(6):844-60. PMC: 3139469. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.023. View

2.
Amaral R, Damasceno N, de Souza L, Devito K . Magnetic resonance images of patients with temporomandibular disorders: prevalence and correlation between disk morphology and displacement. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(6):990-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.002. View

3.
Koolstra J, Tanaka E, van Eijden T . Viscoelastic material model for the temporomandibular joint disc derived from dynamic shear tests or strain-relaxation tests. J Biomech. 2006; 40(10):2330-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.019. View

4.
Hicks J, Uchida T, Seth A, Rajagopal A, Delp S . Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement. J Biomech Eng. 2014; 137(2):020905. PMC: 4321112. DOI: 10.1115/1.4029304. View

5.
Karlo C, Patcas R, Kau T, Watzal H, Signorelli L, Muller L . MRI of the temporo-mandibular joint: which sequence is best suited to assess the cortical bone of the mandibular condyle? A cadaveric study using micro-CT as the standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(7):1579-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2391-8. View