» Articles » PMID: 30785844

Evaluating a Solely Mechanical Articulating Laparoscopic Device: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Feb 21
PMID 30785844
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The FlexDex (FD) is a solely mechanical articulating device that combines the functionality of robotic surgery with the relative low cost and simplicity of laparoscopy. We sought to evaluate the performance of first-time FD users while performing a simple suture task at locations of varying degrees of difficulty.

Study Design: A prospective, randomized crossover study was performed comparing the FD to standard laparoscopy (SL). Two specific groups were evaluated; Group 1 consisted of complete novices, and Group 2 consisted of surgical trainees. Participants performed a simple suture with both FD and SL locations of varying degrees of difficulty (Easy, Moderate, and Hard). The following outcomes were evaluated: Instrument Function and Ergonomics (Comfort/Ergonomics survey), Task Difficulty (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index [NASA-TLX]), Task Performance Quality (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills [OSATS]), and Time (seconds).

Results: Twenty-two participants were enrolled with 12 participants in Group 1 and 10 participants in Group 2. Group 1-FD participants experienced overall less shoulder strain (1.2 ± 0.40 versus 1.9 ± 0.90, P = .01), and Group 2-FD participants experienced less shoulder (2.5 ± 0.66 versus 4.0 ± 0.50, P = .01), back (1.1 ± 0.32 versus 1.9 ± 0.74, P = .01), and forearm strain (1.9 ± 0.88 versus 2.5 ± 1.1, P = .04). Group 1 participants using the FD experienced higher mental demand (73 ± 17 versus 48 ± 27, P < .01) and perceived effort (70 ± 20 versus 54 ± 23, P < .001). Both Group 1 and Group 2 FD participants performed tasks at the Hard location more effectively. Both Group 1 (70 versus 87, P = .21) and Group 2 (53 versus 60, P = .55) performed tasks at the Hard location in similar times, while Group 1 (80 versus 177, P = .03) and Group 2 (33 versus 70, P = .001) performed tasks at the Easy location in shorter times using SL.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the first assessment of the FD, a mechanically articulating laparoscopic tool. First-time FD users demonstrated improved ergonomics and effectiveness suturing at difficult locations. Future studies will focus on comparison to robotic surgery and translation into clinical applications.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of articulating laparoscopic instrument use in laparoscopic adnexectomy: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Seo J, Choi C, Lee Y Gland Surg. 2024; 13(6):864-870.

PMID: 39015698 PMC: 11247574. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-533.


Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.

Voskens F, van der Schans E, Ruurda J, Broeders I BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1):59.

PMID: 35172810 PMC: 8851769. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01513-2.


Assessment of an Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder (FlexDex™) Compared to a Conventional Rigid Needle Holder in 2-Dimension Vision Amongst Novices: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Motahariasl N, Farzaneh S, Motahariasl S, Kokotkin I, Sousi S, Zargaran A Med Devices (Auckl). 2022; 15:15-25.

PMID: 35153517 PMC: 8824294. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S345140.


Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Meinzer A, Alkatout I, Krebs T, Baastrup J, Reischig K, Meiksans R J Clin Med. 2020; 9(12).

PMID: 33321836 PMC: 7764454. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123999.


Three-dimensional Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pantalos G, Patsouras D, Spartalis E, Dimitroulis D, Tsourouflis G, Nikiteas N In Vivo. 2019; 34(1):11-21.

PMID: 31882458 PMC: 6984079. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11740.