» Articles » PMID: 30783546

New European Union Regulations Related to Whole Slide Image Scanners and Image Analysis Software

Overview
Journal J Pathol Inform
Date 2019 Feb 21
PMID 30783546
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whole slide imaging (WSI) scanners and automatic image analysis algorithms, in order to be used for clinical applications, including primary diagnosis in pathology, are subject to specific regulatory frameworks in each country. Until May 25, 2018, in the European Union (EU), diagnostic (IVD) medical devices were regulated by directive 98/79/EC ( diagnostic medical device directive [IVDD]). Main scanner vendors have obtained a Conformité Européenne mark of their products that in Europe were classified as General Class IVDD, so that conformity is only based on a self-declaration of the manufacturer. This contrasts with the initial classification of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of WSI system as Class III medical devices, although the first digital pathology WSI system to be cleared by FDA was classified as Class II, with special controls. Other digital pathology solutions (automated cervical cytology slide reader) are considered of higher risk by US and European regulations. There is also some disparity in the classification of image analysis solutions between Europe and the United States. All IVD-MDs must be approved under the new European regulation ( diagnostic medical device regulation) 2017/746 after May 26, 2024. This means the need of a performance evaluation, including a scientific validity report, an analytical performance report, and a clinical performance report. According to its clinical use (e.g., screening, diagnosis, or staging of cancer), a WSI slide scanner can be now classified as Class C device. A special regulation is applied to companion diagnostics. The new EU regulation 2017/746 contemplates the use of standard unique identifiers for medical devices and the creation of a European database on medical devices (Eudamed). Existing validation studies and clinical guidelines already available in the literature are a sound basis to avoid that this new regulation becomes a barrier for digital pathology development in Europe.

Citing Articles

Computational pathology applied to clinical colorectal cancer cohorts identifies immune and endothelial cell spatial patterns predictive of outcome.

Trahearn N, Sakr C, Banerjee A, Lee S, Baker A, Kocher H J Pathol. 2025; 265(2):198-210.

PMID: 39788558 PMC: 11717494. DOI: 10.1002/path.6378.


Digital pathology implementation in cancer diagnostics: towards informed decision-making.

Sulaieva O, Dudin O, Koshyk O, Panko M, Kobyliak N Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1358305.

PMID: 38873358 PMC: 11169727. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1358305.


Development of an Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tool for Automated Assessment of Cellularity in Bone Marrow Biopsies in Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

DAbbronzo G, DAntonio A, De Chiara A, Panico L, Sparano L, Diluvio A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730640 PMC: 11083301. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091687.


National digital pathology projects in Switzerland: A 2023 update.

Grobholz R, Janowczyk A, Frei A, Kreutzfeldt M, Koelzer V, Zlobec I Pathologie (Heidelb). 2023; 44(Suppl 3):225-228.

PMID: 37987815 PMC: 10739407. DOI: 10.1007/s00292-023-01259-5.


Artificial intelligence-assisted digital pathology for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: current status and future directions.

Ratziu V, Hompesch M, Petitjean M, Serdjebi C, Iyer J, Parwani A J Hepatol. 2023; 80(2):335-351.

PMID: 37879461 PMC: 11822446. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.10.015.


References
1.
Long R, Smith A, Machotka S, Chlipala E, Cann J, Knight B . Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee (SRPC) paper: validation of digital pathology systems in the regulated nonclinical environment. Toxicol Pathol. 2012; 41(1):115-24. DOI: 10.1177/0192623312451162. View

2.
Bernard C, Chandrakanth S, Cornell I, Dalton J, Evans A, Garcia B . Guidelines from the Canadian Association of Pathologists for establishing a telepathology service for anatomic pathology using whole-slide imaging. J Pathol Inform. 2014; 5(1):15. PMC: 4023030. DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.129455. View

3.
Buck T, Dilorio R, Havrilla L, ONeill D . Validation of a whole slide imaging system for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: A community hospital experience. J Pathol Inform. 2014; 5(1):43. PMC: 4260323. DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.145731. View

4.
Garcia-Rojo M . International Clinical Guidelines for the Adoption of Digital Pathology: A Review of Technical Aspects. Pathobiology. 2016; 83(2-3):99-109. DOI: 10.1159/000441192. View