Cost Effectiveness of Mobile Health for Antenatal Care and Facility Births in Nigeria

Overview

Journal Ann Glob Health

Publisher Ubiquity Press

Specialties General Medicine
Public Health

Date 2019 Feb 20

PMID 30779506

Citations 10

Authors

Diana M Bowser

Donald S Shepard

Allyala Nandakumar

Adeyemi Okunogbe

Tyler Morrill

Yara Halasa-Rappell

Monica Jordan

Farida Mushi

Carolyn Boyce

Oluwayemisi A Erhunmwunse

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The use of mobile technology in the health sector, often referred to as mHealth, is an innovation that is being used in countries to improve health outcomes and increase and improve both the demand and supply of health care services. This study assesses the actual cost-effectiveness of initiating and implementing the use of the mHealth as a supply side job aid for antenatal care. The study also estimates the cost-effectiveness ratio if mHealth was also used to encourage and track women through facility delivery.

Methods: The methodology utilized a retrospective, micro-costing technique to extract costing data from health facilities and administrative offices to estimate the costs of implementing the mHealth antenatal care program and estimate the cost of facility delivery for those that used the antenatal care services in the year 2014. Five different costing tools were developed to assist in the costing analysis.

Findings: The results show that the provision of tetanus toxoid vaccination and malaria prophylaxis during pregnancy and improved labor and delivery during facility delivery contributed the most to mortality reductions for women, neonates and stillbirths in mHealth facilities versus non-mHealth facilities. The cost-effectiveness ratio of this program for antenatal care and no demand-side generation for facility delivery is US$13,739 per life saved. The cost-effectiveness ratio adding in an additional demand-side generation for facility births reduces to US$9,806 per life saved.

Conclusion: These results show that mHealth programs are inexpensive and save a number of lives for the dollar investment and could save additional lives and funds if women were also encouraged to seek facility delivery.

Citing Articles

Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.

Broomhead S, Mars M, Scott R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(10).

PMID: 39457250 PMC: 11507607. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21101277.

Smartphone-Based Speech Therapy for Poststroke Dysarthria: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Feasibility.

Kim Y, Kim M, Kim J, Song T J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e56417.

PMID: 38509662 PMC: 11082729. DOI: 10.2196/56417.

Efficacy and feasibility of a digital speech therapy for post-stroke dysarthria: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Kim Y, Kim M, Kim J, Song T Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1305297.

PMID: 38356882 PMC: 10865504. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1305297.

Integration of Telehealth in Routine Perinatal Care: A Model of Care for Primary Healthcare Clinics in Saudi Arabia.

Wali R Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47295.

PMID: 38021871 PMC: 10657159. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47295.

Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.

Stanic T, Saygin Avsar T, Gomes M J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45958.

PMID: 37921844 PMC: 10656663. DOI: 10.2196/45958.

References

Tamrat T, Kachnowski S . Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J. 2011; 16(5):1092-101. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0836-3. View

Schantz-Dunn J, Nour N . Malaria and pregnancy: a global health perspective. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 2(3):186-92. PMC: 2760896. View

Mangham-Jefferies L, Pitt C, Cousens S, Mills A, Schellenberg J . Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:243. PMC: 4223592. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-243. View

Alfonso Y, Bishai D, Bua J, Mutebi A, Mayora C, Ekirapa-Kiracho E . Cost-effectiveness analysis of a voucher scheme combined with obstetrical quality improvements: quasi experimental results from Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2013; 30(1):88-99. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czt100. View

Labrique A, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G . mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014; 1(2):160-71. PMC: 4168567. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031. View

Alabi O, Olatunde O, Olarunfemi G, Gbenga O, Onile T, Temitope G . The trend in maternal mortality in an upgraded tertiary facility in North Central Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2013; 21(3):282-9. View

Colaci D, Chaudhri S, Vasan A . mHealth Interventions in Low-Income Countries to Address Maternal Health: A Systematic Review. Ann Glob Health. 2017; 82(5):922-935. DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.09.001. View

Agarwal S, Lefevre A, Lee J, LEngle K, Mehl G, Sinha C . Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ. 2016; 352:i1174. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i1174. View

Noordam A, Kuepper B, Stekelenburg J, Milen A . Improvement of maternal health services through the use of mobile phones. Trop Med Int Health. 2011; 16(5):622-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02747.x. View

10.

Lester R, Ritvo P, Mills E, Kariri A, Karanja S, Chung M . Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010; 376(9755):1838-45. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61997-6. View

11.

Nurmatov U, Lee S, Nwaru B, Mukherjee M, Grant L, Pagliari C . The effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2014; 4(1):010407. PMC: 4073240. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.04.010407. View

12.

De la Torre-Diez I, Lopez-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado J, de Castro C . Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2014; 21(2):81-5. PMC: 4312789. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053. View

13.

Lee S, Nurmatov U, Nwaru B, Mukherjee M, Grant L, Pagliari C . Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2015; 6(1):010401. PMC: 4643860. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.010401. View

14.

Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P . The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(1):e1001363. PMC: 3566926. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363. View

15.

Colbourn T, Nambiar B, Bondo A, Makwenda C, Tsetekani E, Makonda-Ridley A . Effects of quality improvement in health facilities and community mobilization through women's groups on maternal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in three districts of Malawi: MaiKhanda, a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Int Health. 2013; 5(3):180-95. PMC: 5102328. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/iht011. View

16.

Larson E, Vail D, Mbaruku G, Mbatia R, Kruk M . Beyond utilization: measuring effective coverage of obstetric care along the quality cascade. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016; 29(1):104-110. PMC: 5890864. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw141. View

17.

Piette J, Lun K, Moura Jr L, Fraser H, Mechael P, Powell J . Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low- and middle-income countries: where do we go from here?. Bull World Health Organ. 2012; 90(5):365-72. PMC: 3341688. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.099069. View

18.

van Heerden A, Tomlinson M, Swartz L . Point of care in your pocket: a research agenda for the field of m-health. Bull World Health Organ. 2012; 90(5):393-4. PMC: 3341694. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.099788. View

19.

Mangone E, Agarwal S, LEngle K, Lasway C, Zan T, van Beijma H . Sustainable Cost Models for mHealth at Scale: Modeling Program Data from m4RH Tanzania. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0148011. PMC: 4733101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148011. View

20.

Vassall A, Mangham-Jefferies L, Gomez G, Pitt C, Foster N . Incorporating Demand and Supply Constraints into Economic Evaluations in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries. Health Econ. 2016; 25 Suppl 1:95-115. PMC: 5042074. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3306. View