» Articles » PMID: 30775055

Functional and Aesthetic Evaluation After Cranial Reconstruction with Polymethyl Methacrylate Prostheses Using Low-cost 3D Printing Templates in Patients with Cranial Defects Secondary to Decompressive Craniectomies: A Prospective Study

Abstract

Background: Cranial reconstruction surgery is a procedure used as an attempt to reestablish the cranial bone anatomy. This study evaluates the symptomatic and aesthetic improvement of patients with cranial defects secondary to decompressive craniectomies after cranial reconstruction with customized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) prostheses. Secondly, we aim to divide our experience in the production of these prostheses with a low-cost method.

Methods: A prospective study was carried out with patients submitted to cranioplasty at the Hospital da Restauração between 2014 and 2017. A total of 63 cranioplasties were performed using customized PMMA prosthesis produced by 3D impression molds. All patients underwent a functional and aesthetic evaluation questionnaire in the preoperative period and in the sixth postoperative month.

Results: Sixty-three patients underwent cranioplasty with a mean age of 33 years, ranging from 13 to 58 years, 55 males and 8 females. The mean area of the defect was 147 cm. The mean postoperative follow-up of the patients was 21 months, ranging from 6 to 33 months. Fifty-five patients attended the 6-month postoperative consultation. All patients presented symptomatic improvement after reconstruction of the skull. The infection rate was 3.2%, 4.8% of extrusion, 1.6% of prosthesis fracture, 7.9% of extradural hematoma, 17.4% of reoperation, 5% of wound dehiscence, and 4.8% of removal of the prosthesis.

Conclusion: Cranioplasty, with a customized PMMA prosthesis, improved the symptoms and aesthetic appearance of all operated patients. The use of prototypes to customize cranial prostheses facilitated the operative technique and allowed the recovery of a cranial contour very close to normal.

Citing Articles

Breaking Barriers in Cranioplasty: 3D Printing in Low and Middle-Income Settings-Insights from Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Beculic H, Spahic D, Begagic E, Pugonja R, Skomorac R, Jusic A Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(10).

PMID: 37893450 PMC: 10608598. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101732.


Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties.

Oberoi M, Mirzaie S, Huang K, Caprini R, Hu V, Dejam D Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023; 154(4):757e-772e.

PMID: 37749784 PMC: 10963343. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011093.


Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty.

Ebel F, Schon S, Sharma N, Guzman R, Mariani L, Thieringer F Neurosurg Rev. 2023; 46(1):93.

PMID: 37074490 PMC: 10115682. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02000-9.


Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Kroczek K, Turek P, Mazur D, Szczygielski J, Filip D, Brodowski R Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35458276 PMC: 9027145. DOI: 10.3390/polym14081526.


Design of 3D Additively Manufactured Hybrid Structures for Cranioplasty.

De Santis R, Russo T, Rau J, Papallo I, Martorelli M, Gloria A Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(1).

PMID: 33401673 PMC: 7794857. DOI: 10.3390/ma14010181.


References
1.
Dujovny , Agner , Aviles . Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg. 1999; 9(5):271-278. DOI: 10.1007/s003290050143. View

2.
Badie B, Preston J, Hartig G . Use of titanium mesh for reconstruction of large anterior cranial base defects. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93(4):711-4. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0711. View

3.
Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M . Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144(10):1033-40; discussion 1040. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-002-0996-4. View

4.
Saringer W, Nobauer-Huhmann I, Knosp E . Cranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymere (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144(11):1193-203. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-002-0995-5. View

5.
Tabaddor K, LaMorgese J . Complication of a large cranial defect. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1976; 44(4):506-8. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1976.44.4.0506. View