» Articles » PMID: 30772611

Income-related Inequality and Inequity in Children's Health Care: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Data from Brazil

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2019 Feb 18
PMID 30772611
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Brazilian Unified Health System was created in the late 1980s to ensure free universal access to health care and was funded by taxes and social contributions. The persistent inequity in access to health services in favour of richer individuals in Brazil has been observed in the literature. However, to the best of our knowledge, no measurement of inequality in medicine use or private health insurance (PHI) among children has been performed with longitudinal data. This paper uses inequality indices and their decompositions to analyse the income-related inequalities/inequities in children's health care in the city of Pelotas, Brazil, using longitudinal data following children from 12 to 72 months of age. Our sample with data in all waves has between 1877 and 2638 children (varying according to outcome). We seek to answer three questions: i) How does the inequality/inequity in health care evolve as children grow up? ii) What are the main factors associated with inequality in children's health care? iii) How much of the change in inequality/inequity is explained by mobility in children's health care and income mobility? We found that inequities in health care have their beginnings in early childhood but that there was a reduction in inequity at 72 months of age. Ownership of children's PHI was associated with greater pro-rich inequity in health care. The reduction in inequality/inequity was linked to mobility in the sense that initially poorer children had greater gains in health care (a greater increase in PHI ownership and a lower reduction in medicine use). Despite this improvement among the poorest, apparently, the Brazilian public health service seems to fail to ensure equity in health care use among children, with possible long-term consequences on inequalities in health.

Citing Articles

Litigation in access to universal health coverage for children and adolescents in Brazil.

Coelho Tavares da Silva S, Tavares da Silva P, Antao de Medeiros R, Barbosa do Nascimento V Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1402648.

PMID: 38983258 PMC: 11232527. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402648.


Explanation of Socio-economic Inequality in Medicine Use: A Cross-sectional Analysis from Iran.

Torabipour A, Harati Khalilabad T, Najafpour Z, Araban M, Vahedi S Iran J Pharm Res. 2023; 21(1):e129431.

PMID: 36942080 PMC: 10024324. DOI: 10.5812/ijpr-129431.


Intimate Partner Violence Against Brazilian Mothers is Associated With Their Children's Lower Quality-of-Life Scores: A Cross-Sectional Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Melo T, de Araujo L, Rosa J, Arantes M, Lucia Israel V, Signorelli M Health Serv Insights. 2023; 16:11786329231157550.

PMID: 36883105 PMC: 9978238. DOI: 10.1177/11786329231157550.


Grandchild care, inadequate medical insurance protection, and inequalities in socioeconomic factors exacerbate childhood obesity in China.

Yang J, Shen Y, Deng Y, Liao Z Front Public Health. 2022; 10:950870.

PMID: 36091537 PMC: 9453265. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950870.


Use of oral health care services in the United States: unequal, inequitable-a cross-sectional study.

Ju X, Mejia G, Wu Q, Luo H, Jamieson L BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):370.

PMID: 34301209 PMC: 8299583. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01708-8.


References
1.
Bago dUva T, Jones A, van Doorslaer E . Measurement of horizontal inequity in health care utilisation using European panel data. J Health Econ. 2008; 28(2):280-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.008. View

2.
Santos I, Barros A, Matijasevich A, Domingues M, Barros F, Victora C . Cohort profile: the 2004 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 40(6):1461-8. PMC: 3235016. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq130. View

3.
Pinto L, Giovanella L . The Family Health Strategy: expanding access and reducinghospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). Cien Saude Colet. 2018; 23(6):1903-1914. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018236.05592018. View

4.
Wagstaff A . The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ. 2004; 14(4):429-32. DOI: 10.1002/hec.953. View

5.
Pan W . Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001; 57(1):120-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00120.x. View