» Articles » PMID: 30767179

A Phase 2 Study of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis (KUGC06)

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Feb 16
PMID 30767179
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The authors previously showed the significant efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer with limited peritoneal metastasis. They conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction chemotherapy using a docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) triplet regimen to treat gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Methods: The key eligibility criteria were gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology but no other distant metastases and capability of oral administration. The patients received three 28-day cycles of DCS (60 mg/m of cisplatin, 40 mg/m of docetaxel on day 1, and 80 mg/m of S-1 from day 1 to day 14), then underwent D2 gastrectomy if R0 was possible. The primary end point was the R0 resection rate. The sample size was determined to have 80% power for detecting a 20% improvement in the R0 resection rate over a 45% baseline for a one-tailed alpha of 0.1.

Results: Among 30 enrolled patients, 24 completed three cycles of DCS. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (60%). A complete response of peritoneal metastasis was observed in 16 patients, and 14 patients achieved R0 resection (47%; 95% confidence interval 28-66%). When the extent of peritoneal metastasis was classified as P0CY1, P1, P2, and P3 according to the Japanese classification, the R0 resection rates were respectively 63%, 60%, 46% and 0%.

Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy with DCS is safe and can achieve R0 resection for some patients with limited peritoneal metastasis or positive peritoneal cytology. The efficacy, however, appears similar to that of S-1 plus cisplatin.

Citing Articles

Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the occurrence of complications in patients following robotic radical surgery for gastric cancer.

Ma Y, Deng Y, Wan H, Ma D, Ma L, Fan W Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):54.

PMID: 39873792 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03594-4.


Analysis of the therapeutic effect and influencing factors on unresectable gastric cancer treated with conversion therapy.

Han S, Han S, Qian J, Guo M, Fan J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1435398.

PMID: 39540147 PMC: 11557377. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1435398.


International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer: step by step in the foggy landscape : Bertinoro Workshop, November 2022.

Morgagni P, Bencivenga M, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, Derks S, Di Bartolomeo M Gastric Cancer. 2024; 27(4):649-671.

PMID: 38634954 PMC: 11193703. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01479-5.


A study protocol of a randomized phase II trial of perioperative chemoimmunotherapy verses perioperative chemoimmunotherapy plus preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: the....

Zhou M, Yang W, Xuan Y, Zou W, Wang Y, Zhang Z BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):710.

PMID: 35764956 PMC: 9238164. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09786-9.


Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Zhang X, Huang H, Yang D, Wang P, Huang X, Hu Z Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 20:15330338211036310.

PMID: 34328799 PMC: 8327225. DOI: 10.1177/15330338211036310.