» Articles » PMID: 30762582

Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention

Overview
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30762582
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While widely used and endorsed, there is limited evidence supporting the benefits of activity trackers for increasing physical activity; these devices may be more effective when combined with additional strategies that promote sustained behavior change like motivational interviewing (MI) and habit development.

Objective: This study aims to determine the utility of wearable activity trackers alone or in combination with these behavior change strategies for promoting improvements in active and sedentary behaviors.

Methods: A sample of 91 adults (48/91 female, 53%) was randomized to receive a Fitbit Charge alone or in combination with MI and habit education for 12 weeks. Active and sedentary behaviors were assessed pre and post using research-grade activity monitors (ActiGraph and activPAL), and the development of habits surrounding the use of the trackers was assessed postintervention with the Self-Reported Habit Index. During the intervention, Fitbit wear time and activity levels were monitored with the activity trackers. Linear regression analyses were used to determine the influence of the trial on outcomes of physical activity and sedentary time. The influence of habits was examined using correlation coefficients relating habits of tracker use (wearing the tracker and checking data on the tracker and associated app) to Fitbit wear time and activity levels during the intervention and at follow-up.

Results: Regression analyses revealed no significant differences by group in any of the primary outcomes (all P>.05). However, personal characteristics, including lower baseline activity levels (beta=-.49, P=.01) and lack of previous experience with pedometers (beta=-.23, P=.03) were predictive of greater improvements in moderate and vigorous physical activity. Furthermore, for individuals with higher activity levels at the baseline, MI and habit education were more effective for maintaining these activity levels when compared with receiving a Fitbit alone (eg, small increase of ~48 steps/day, d=0.01, vs large decrease of ~1830 steps/day, d=0.95). Finally, habit development was significantly related to steps/day during (r=.30, P=.004) and following the intervention (r=.27, P=.03).

Conclusions: This study suggests that activity trackers may have beneficial effects on physical activity in healthy adults, but benefits vary based on individual factors. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of habit development surrounding the wear and use of activity trackers and the associated software to promote increases in physical activity.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03837366; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03837366.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Needs of People With Chronic Low Back Pain and Health Care Professionals for mHealth Devices to Support Self-Managed Physical Activity and Pain: User-Centered Design Approach.

Berger M, Deblock-Bellamy A, Cheze L, Robert T, Desrosiers J, Christe G JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e59897.

PMID: 39509701 PMC: 11582481. DOI: 10.2196/59897.


A Nationwide Physical Activity Intervention for 654,500 Adults in Singapore: Cost-Utility Analysis.

Ang G, Tan C, Teerawattananon Y, Muller-Riemenschneider F, Chen C JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10():e46178.

PMID: 39365682 PMC: 11468974. DOI: 10.2196/46178.


A full-factorial test of motivational and volitional intervention strategies for promoting exercise habit formation and exercise maintenance among new users of an online exercise class platform.

Phillips L, More K, Lamoureux N, Dixon P, Meyer J, Ellingson L Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024; 17(1):e12597.

PMID: 39354798 PMC: 11652125. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12597.


Effectiveness of behavioural interventions with motivational interviewing on physical activity outcomes in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhu S, Sinha D, Kirk M, Michalopoulou M, Hajizadeh A, Wren G BMJ. 2024; 386:e078713.

PMID: 38986547 PMC: 11234249. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078713.


The Effects of mHealth Interventions on Quality of Life, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hou Q, Liu L, Wu Y J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e52341.

PMID: 38861710 PMC: 11200038. DOI: 10.2196/52341.


References
1.
Lobelo F, Kelli H, Tejedor S, Pratt M, McConnell M, Martin S . The Wild Wild West: A Framework to Integrate mHealth Software Applications and Wearables to Support Physical Activity Assessment, Counseling and Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016; 58(6):584-94. PMC: 5362162. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.02.007. View

2.
Gardner B, Lally P, Wardle J . Making health habitual: the psychology of 'habit-formation' and general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(605):664-6. PMC: 3505409. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X659466. View

3.
Hardcastle S, Taylor A, Bailey M, Harley R, Hagger M . Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomised controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:40. PMC: 3639183. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-40. View

4.
Kim Y, Lumpkin A, Lochbaum M, Stegemeier S, Kitten K . Promoting physical activity using a wearable activity tracker in college students: A cluster randomized controlled trial. J Sports Sci. 2018; 36(16):1889-1896. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1423886. View

5.
Rowe-Roberts D, Cercos R, Mueller F . Preliminary results from a study of the impact of digital activity trackers on health risk status. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014; 204:143-8. View