» Articles » PMID: 30762521

Negative Reciprocity, Not Ordered Assembly, Underlies the Interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 on DNA

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30762521
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mode of interaction of transcription factors (TFs) on eukaryotic genomes remains a matter of debate. Single-molecule data in living cells for the TFs Sox2 and Oct4 were previously interpreted as evidence of ordered assembly on DNA. However, the quantity that was calculated does not determine binding order but, rather, energy expenditure away from thermodynamic equilibrium. Here, we undertake a rigorous biophysical analysis which leads to the concept of reciprocity. The single-molecule data imply that Sox2 and Oct4 exhibit negative reciprocity, with expression of Sox2 increasing Oct4's genomic binding but expression of Oct4 decreasing Sox2's binding. Models show that negative reciprocity can arise either from energy expenditure or from a mixture of positive and negative cooperativity at distinct genomic loci. Both possibilities imply unexpected complexity in how TFs interact on DNA, for which single-molecule methods provide novel detection capabilities.

Citing Articles

Emerging cooperativity between Oct4 and Sox2 governs the pluripotency network in early mouse embryos.

Hou Y, Nie Z, Jiang Q, Velychko S, Heising S, Bedzhov I Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 40014376 PMC: 11867617. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.100735.


Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context.

Martinez-Corral R, Friedrich D, Fromel R, Velten L, Gunawardena J, DePace A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38854049 PMC: 11160767. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.29.596388.


Governing principles of transcriptional logic out of equilibrium.

Dixit S, Middelkoop T, Choubey S Biophys J. 2024; 123(8):1015-1029.

PMID: 38486450 PMC: 11052701. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.020.


The linear framework II: using graph theory to analyse the transient regime of Markov processes.

Nam K, Gunawardena J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1233808.

PMID: 38020901 PMC: 10656611. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1233808.


Transcriptional kinetic synergy: A complex landscape revealed by integrating modeling and synthetic biology.

Martinez-Corral R, Park M, Biette K, Friedrich D, Scholes C, Khalil A Cell Syst. 2023; 14(4):324-339.e7.

PMID: 37080164 PMC: 10472254. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.02.003.


References
1.
Scholes C, DePace A, Sanchez A . Combinatorial Gene Regulation through Kinetic Control of the Transcription Cycle. Cell Syst. 2017; 4(1):97-108.e9. PMC: 5469051. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.11.012. View

2.
Morisaki T, Muller W, Golob N, Mazza D, McNally J . Single-molecule analysis of transcription factor binding at transcription sites in live cells. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4456. PMC: 4144071. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5456. View

3.
Courey A . Cooperativity in transcriptional control. Curr Biol. 2001; 11(7):R250-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00130-0. View

4.
Sherman M, Cohen B . Thermodynamic state ensemble models of cis-regulation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(3):e1002407. PMC: 3315449. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002407. View

5.
Ahsendorf T, Wong F, Eils R, Gunawardena J . A framework for modelling gene regulation which accommodates non-equilibrium mechanisms. BMC Biol. 2014; 12:102. PMC: 4288563. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-014-0102-4. View