» Articles » PMID: 30762482

Scarcity Mindset in Reproductive Health Decision Making: a Qualitative Study from Rural Malawi

Overview
Journal Cult Health Sex
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30762482
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Poverty has widespread impacts on health. In dealing with resource scarcity, individuals' thoughts are narrowed to address immediate resource limitations, thus crowding out other information, a phenomenon called the To assess for indication of a scarcity mindset in sexual and reproductive decision making in rural Malawi, a setting with extreme resource scarcity, we collected qualitative data in the form of eight focus group discussions and 28 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with women and men of varying ages and marital status. Participants, who were of low socioeconomic status, described constant tradeoffs that they made to secure their daily needs. They articulated both the challenges of supporting many children and the need to bear many children to guarantee their own future support. While participants described wealthy people as being concerned with preserving resources (often through the practice of limiting childbearing), they described poor people as working to increase their probability of success against an uncertain economic future (without due consideration of contraceptive behaviours). We found qualitative evidence that a scarcity mindset may influence reproductive decision making among women and men in rural Malawi and may preclude the use of contraception in low-resource settings.

Citing Articles

Scarcity mindset reduces empathic responses to others' pain: the behavioral and neural evidence.

Li W, Meng J, Cui F Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 18(1).

PMID: 36884019 PMC: 10036876. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad012.


Scarcity Enhances Outcome Evaluation in the Present: Electroencephalography Evidence.

Yi L, Ding D, Zhang X, Fu D Brain Sci. 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36421884 PMC: 9688790. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111560.

References
1.
Stephenson R, Baschieri A, Clements S, Hennink M, Madise N . Contextual influences on modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(7):1233-40. PMC: 1913073. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071522. View

2.
Zwane A . Economics. Implications of scarcity. Science. 2012; 338(6107):617-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1230292. View

3.
Bongaarts J, Casterline J . Fertility Transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa Different?. Popul Dev Rev. 2014; 38(Suppl 1):153-168. PMC: 4011385. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00557.x. View

4.
Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Potts M . Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2006; 37(2):87-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00088.x. View

5.
Wulifan J, Brenner S, Jahn A, De Allegri M . A scoping review on determinants of unmet need for family planning among women of reproductive age in low and middle income countries. BMC Womens Health. 2016; 16:2. PMC: 4714507. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-015-0281-3. View