» Articles » PMID: 30761699

Patient Stakeholder Engagement in Research: A Narrative Review to Describe Foundational Principles and Best Practice Activities

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30761699
Citations 112
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts.

Objective: The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. SEARCH STRATEGY, INCLUSION CRITERIA, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data.

Main Results: We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were "respect" (n = 25, 45%) and "equitable power between all team members" (n = 21, 38%). Creating "trust between patient stakeholders and researchers" was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty-seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders' time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement.

Discussion And Conclusions: Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient-centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers.

Citing Articles

Through the lens of Good Participatory Practice: Findings and lessons learned from the healthcare worker subcommittee of the COVID-19 Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes Registry.

Chen-Lim M, Koellhoffer J, Turner K, Summerlin M, George A, Handberg E J Clin Transl Sci. 2025; 9(1):e9.

PMID: 39830611 PMC: 11736295. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.668.


Patient and Public Involvement in Pharmacoepidemiological Research: An Environmental Scan of an Emerging Area.

Julie R, Yael B, Anais H, Anne T, Julie H, Marie V Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025; 34(1):e70080.

PMID: 39776060 PMC: 11706696. DOI: 10.1002/pds.70080.


Development of a rehabilitation programme for young adult cancer survivors using co-production.

Aagesen M, Sampedro Pilegaard M, Janssens A, Hauken M, la Cour K Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):134.

PMID: 39707498 PMC: 11662816. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00667-y.


Setting the balance of care for older adults at risk of hospitalization and delayed discharge: A mixed-methods research protocol.

Kuluski K, Jacobson D, Ghazalbash S, Baek J, Rosella L, Mansfield E PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315918.

PMID: 39689096 PMC: 11651538. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315918.


Involving Knowledge Users in Health Services Research: Collective Reflections and Learning From a National Evaluation of Recurrent Miscarriage Services.

Hennessy M, Dennehy R, OLeary H, ODonoghue K Health Expect. 2024; 27(6):e70125.

PMID: 39682042 PMC: 11649583. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70125.


References
1.
Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

2.
Duffett L . Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2016; 150:113-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029. View

3.
Lavallee D, Williams C, Tambor E, Deverka P . Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success?. J Comp Eff Res. 2013; 1(5):397-407. DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.44. View

4.
Israel B, Krieger J, Vlahov D, Ciske S, Foley M, Fortin P . Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6):1022-40. PMC: 3261295. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(10):1006-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. View