» Articles » PMID: 30760212

Transcriptomic Response is More Sensitive to Water Deficit in Shoots Than Roots of Vitis Riparia (Michx.)

Overview
Journal BMC Plant Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Feb 15
PMID 30760212
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Drought is an important constraint on grapevine sustainability. Vitis riparia, widely used in rootstock and scion breeding, has been studied in isolated leaf drying response studies; however, it is essential to identify key root and shoot water deficit signaling traits in intact plants. This information will aid improved scion and rootstock selection and management practices in grapevine. RNAseq data were generated from V. riparia roots and shoots under water deficit and well-watered conditions to determine root signaling and shoot responses to water deficit.

Results: Shoot elongation, photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance were significantly reduced in water deficit (WD) treated than in well-watered grapevines. RNAseq analysis indicated greater transcriptional differences in shoots than in roots under WD, with 6925 and 1395 genes differentially expressed, respectively (q-value < 0.05). There were 50 and 25 VitisNet pathways significantly enriched in WD relative to well-watered treatments in grapevine shoots and roots, respectively. The ABA biosynthesis genes beta-carotene hydroxylase, zeaxanthin epoxidase, and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenases were up-regulated in WD root and WD shoot. A positive enrichment of ABA biosynthesis genes and signaling pathways in WD grapevine roots indicated enhanced root signaling to the shoot. An increased frequency of differentially expressed reactive oxygen species scavenging (ROS) genes were found in the WD shoot. Analyses of hormone signaling genes indicated a strong ABA, auxin, and ethylene network and an ABA, cytokinin, and circadian rhythm network in both WD shoot and WD root.

Conclusions: This work supports previous findings in detached leaf studies suggesting ABA-responsive binding factor 2 (ABF2) is a central regulator in ABA signaling in the WD shoot. Likewise, ABF2 may have a key role in V. riparia WD shoot and WD root. A role for ABF3 was indicated only in WD root. WD shoot and WD root hormone expression analysis identified strong ABA, auxin, ethylene, cytokinin, and circadian rhythm signaling networks. These results present the first ABA, cytokinin, and circadian rhythm signaling network in roots under water deficit. These networks point to organ specific regulators that should be explored to further define the communication network from soil to shoot.

Citing Articles

Comparative transcriptome and coexpression network analysis reveals key pathways and hub candidate genes associated with sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) drought tolerance.

Shi H, Hou J, Li D, Hu H, Wang Y, Wu Y BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):224.

PMID: 38539093 PMC: 10976745. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-04932-w.


Network Biology Analyses and Dynamic Modeling of Gene Regulatory Networks under Drought Stress Reveal Major Transcriptional Regulators in .

Kumar N, Mishra B, Liu J, Mohan B, Thingujam D, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(8).

PMID: 37108512 PMC: 10139068. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087349.


Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses - prospects of using genome editing.

Sustek-Sanchez F, Rognli O, Rostoks N, Somera M, Jaskune K, Kovi M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1127532.

PMID: 36824201 PMC: 9941169. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1127532.


Genetic analysis of grapevine root system architecture and loci associated gene networks.

Alahakoon D, Fennell A Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1083374.

PMID: 36816477 PMC: 9932984. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1083374.


Combined analysis of transcriptome and metabolome reveals the molecular mechanism and candidate genes of drought tolerance.

Yang F, Lv G Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1020367.

PMID: 36330247 PMC: 9622360. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1020367.


References
1.
Lowe K, Walker M . Genetic linkage map of the interspecific grape rootstock cross Ramsey (Vitis champinii) x Riparia Gloire (Vitis riparia). Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 112(8):1582-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-006-0264-8. View

2.
OBrien J, Benkova E . Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4:451. PMC: 3833016. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00451. View

3.
Schmidt A, Hall M . Signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999; 14:305-38. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.305. View

4.
Chaves M, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, Costa J, Santos T, Regalado A . Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann Bot. 2010; 105(5):661-76. PMC: 2859908. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq030. View

5.
Deluc L, Quilici D, Decendit A, Grimplet J, Wheatley M, Schlauch K . Water deficit alters differentially metabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:212. PMC: 2701440. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-212. View