» Articles » PMID: 30759129

Deer Browsing Alters Sound Propagation in Temperate Deciduous Forests

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Feb 14
PMID 30759129
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficacy of animal signals is strongly influenced by the structure of the habitat in which they are propagating. In recent years, the habitat structure of temperate forests has been increasingly subject to modifications from foraging by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Increasing deer numbers and the accompanying browsing have been shown to alter vegetation structure and thus the foraging, roosting, and breeding habitats of many species. However, despite a large body of literature on the effects of vegetation structure on sound propagation, we do not yet know what impact deer browsing may have on acoustic communication. Here we used playback experiments to determine whether sound fidelity and amplitude of white noise, pure tones, and trills differed between deer-browsed and deer-excluded plots. We found that sound fidelity, but not amplitude, differed between habitats, with deer-browsed habitats having greater sound fidelity than deer-excluded habitats. Difference in sound propagation characteristics between the two habitats could alter the efficacy of acoustic communication through plasticity, cultural evolution or local adaptation, in turn influencing vocally-mediated behaviors (e.g. agonistic, parent-offspring, mate selection). Reduced signal degradation suggests vocalizations may retain more information, improving the transfer of information to both intended and unintended receivers. Overall, our results suggest that deer browsing impacts sound propagation in temperate deciduous forest, although much work remains to be done on the potential impacts on communication.

References
1.
Peake T, Terry A, McGregor P, Dabelsteen T . Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping?. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1503):1925-9. PMC: 1691105. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2112. View

2.
Bakker E, Olff H, Boekhoff M, Gleichman J, Berendse F . Impact of herbivores on nitrogen cycling: contrasting effects of small and large species. Oecologia. 2003; 138(1):91-101. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1402-5. View

3.
Derryberry E, Gentry K, Derryberry G, Phillips J, Danner R, Danner J . White-crowned sparrow males show immediate flexibility in song amplitude but not in song minimum frequency in response to changes in noise levels in the field. Ecol Evol. 2017; 7(13):4991-5001. PMC: 5496534. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3037. View

4.
Piercy J, Embleton T . Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977; 61(6):1403-18. DOI: 10.1121/1.381455. View

5.
Scherber C, Eisenhauer N, Weisser W, Schmid B, Voigt W, Fischer M . Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature. 2010; 468(7323):553-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature09492. View