» Articles » PMID: 30759040

Human Frontoparietal Cortex Represents Behaviorally Relevant Target Status Based on Abstract Object Features

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2019 Feb 14
PMID 30759040
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Searching for items that are useful given current goals, or "target" recognition, requires observers to flexibly attend to certain object properties at the expense of others. This could involve focusing on the identity of an object while ignoring identity-preserving transformations such as changes in viewpoint or focusing on its current viewpoint while ignoring its identity. To effectively filter out variation due to the irrelevant dimension, performing either type of task is likely to require high-level, abstract search templates. Past work has found target recognition signals in areas of ventral visual cortex and in subregions of parietal and frontal cortex. However, target status in these tasks is typically associated with the identity of an object, rather than identity-orthogonal properties such as object viewpoint. In this study, we used a task that required subjects to identify novel object stimuli as targets according to either identity or viewpoint, each of which was not predictable from low-level properties such as shape. We performed functional MRI in human subjects of both sexes and measured the strength of target-match signals in areas of visual, parietal, and frontal cortex. Our multivariate analyses suggest that the multiple-demand (MD) network, including subregions of parietal and frontal cortex, encodes information about an object's status as a target in the relevant dimension only, across changes in the irrelevant dimension. Furthermore, there was more target-related information in MD regions on correct compared with incorrect trials, suggesting a strong link between MD target signals and behavior. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Real-world target detection tasks, such as searching for a car in a crowded parking lot, require both flexibility and abstraction. We investigated the neural basis of these abilities using a task that required invariant representations of either object identity or viewpoint. Multivariate decoding analyses of our whole brain functional MRI data reveal that invariant target representations are most pronounced in frontal and parietal regions, and the strength of these representations is associated with behavioral performance.

Citing Articles

Gaze and Arrows: Does the Gaze-Following Patch in the Posterior Temporal Cortex Differentiate Social and Symbolic Spatial Cues?.

Gorner M, Ramezanpour H, Dicke P, Thier P eNeuro. 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 38960708 PMC: 11265261. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0065-24.2024.


Inferring shape transformations in a drawing task.

Schmidt F, Tiedemann H, Fleming R, Morgenstern Y Mem Cognit. 2023; 53(1):189-199.

PMID: 37668880 PMC: 11779755. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01452-0.


Preparatory attention to visual features primarily relies on non-sensory representation.

Gong M, Chen Y, Liu T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21726.

PMID: 36526653 PMC: 9758135. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26104-2.


Flexible utilization of spatial- and motor-based codes for the storage of visuo-spatial information.

Henderson M, Rademaker R, Serences J Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35522567 PMC: 9075954. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.75688.


Shared Representational Formats for Information Maintained in Working Memory and Information Retrieved from Long-Term Memory.

Vo V, Sutterer D, Foster J, Sprague T, Awh E, Serences J Cereb Cortex. 2021; 32(5):1077-1092.

PMID: 34428283 PMC: 8889995. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab267.


References
1.
Lui L, Pasternak T . Representation of comparison signals in cortical area MT during a delayed direction discrimination task. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(3):1260-73. PMC: 3174806. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00016.2011. View

2.
Kamitani Y, Tong F . Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(5):679-85. PMC: 1808230. DOI: 10.1038/nn1444. View

3.
Anzellotti S, Fairhall S, Caramazza A . Decoding representations of face identity that are tolerant to rotation. Cereb Cortex. 2013; 24(8):1988-95. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht046. View

4.
Henson R . Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog Neurobiol. 2003; 70(1):53-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00086-8. View

5.
Freedman D, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller E . Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science. 2001; 291(5502):312-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5502.312. View