» Articles » PMID: 30747715

Evaluation of Self-Management Support Functions in Apps for People With Persistent Pain: Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2019 Feb 13
PMID 30747715
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Smartphone apps are a potential mechanism for development of self-management skills in people with persistent pain. However, the inclusion of best-practice content items in available pain management apps fostering core self-management skills for self-management support is not known.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the contents of smartphone apps providing information on pain management strategies for people with persistent pain facilitating self-management support and to appraise the app quality.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in the New Zealand App Store and Google Play Store. Apps were included if they were designed for people with persistent pain, provided information on pain self-management strategies, and were available in English. App contents were evaluated using an a priori 14-item self-management support (SMS-14) checklist. App quality was assessed using the 23-item Mobile Apps Rating Scale.

Results: Of the 939 apps screened, 19 apps met the inclusion criteria. Meditation and guided relaxation were the most frequently included self-management strategies. Overall, the included apps met a median of 4 (range 1-8) of the SMS-14 checklist. A total of 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) met the largest number of items (8 out of 14) to foster self-management of pain. Self-monitoring of symptoms (n=11) and self-tailoring of strategies (n=9) were frequently featured functions, whereas a few apps had features facilitating social support and enabling communicating with clinicians. No apps provided information tailored to the cultural needs of the user. The app quality mean scores using Mobile Apps Rating Scale ranged from 2.7 to 4.5 (out of 5.0). Although use of 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) has been shown to improve health outcomes, none of the included apps have been evaluated in people with persistent pain.

Conclusions: Of the 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) that met the largest number of items to support skills in self-management of pain, 2 apps (PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach and SuperBetter) were free, suggesting the potential for using apps as a scalable, wide-reaching intervention to complement face-to-face care. However, none provided culturally tailored information. Although 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) were validated to show improved health outcomes, none were tested in people with persistent pain. Both users and clinicians should be aware of such limitations and make informed choices in using or recommending apps as a self-management tool. For better integration of apps in clinical practice, concerted efforts are required among app developers, clinicians, and people with persistent pain in developing apps and evaluating for clinical efficacy.

Citing Articles

Changes in cognition, coping, pain and emotions after 12-months access to the digital self-management program EPIO.

Strand E, Varsi C, Borosund E, Eide H, Schreurs K, Waxenberg L Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1540852.

PMID: 40070899 PMC: 11893590. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540852.


Development of a self-management behavior assessment scale for liver cancer patients from ethnic minorities.

Liu B, Chen J, Zhao X, Gui Q, Lin Y, He B BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):315.

PMID: 40001076 PMC: 11863450. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12272-0.


Health professionals' use of smartphone apps for clients with low back pain: an observational study.

Didyk C, Lewis L, Lange B Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025; 26:e14.

PMID: 39991859 PMC: 11883799. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423625000209.


Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences.

Elphinston R, Pager S, Brown K, Sterling M, Fatehi F, Gray P JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e57208.

PMID: 39883931 PMC: 11826952. DOI: 10.2196/57208.


Evaluation of mobile applications related to patients with Parkinson's disease based on their essential features and capabilities.

Azadi H, Akbarzadeh-Totonchi M, Jahani Y, Gohari S, Khajouei R BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):407.

PMID: 39731170 PMC: 11673987. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02804-9.


References
1.
Veehof M, Trompetter H, Bohlmeijer E, Schreurs K . Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016; 45(1):5-31. DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1098724. View

2.
Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S . Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12(1):e4. PMC: 2836773. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1376. View

3.
Dennis C . Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003; 40(3):321-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00092-5. View

4.
Kamper S, Apeldoorn A, Chiarotto A, Smeets R, Ostelo R, Guzman J . Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (9):CD000963. PMC: 10945502. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View