» Articles » PMID: 30746418

Telemedicine Vs Office Visits in a Movement Disorders Clinic: Comparative Satisfaction of Physicians and Patients

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Feb 13
PMID 30746418
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare patient and physician satisfaction between home-based telemedicine visits and office visits for follow-up care within a movement disorders program.

Methods: Patients were offered telemedicine visits as follow-up care. After telemedicine visits, a questionnaire of items along a 10-point Likert Scale (10 = most satisfied) assessed patient and overall physician satisfaction, comparing the experience to past in-office visits.

Results: Patients and physicians were highly satisfied with the telemedicine experience, both groups having median endorsement scores of 9.25 and 10.0, respectively (response range 6-10), and furthermore, favoring future telemedicine visits when feasible. Although some assessments could not be performed (postural stability, rigidity), physicians likewise favored having future telemedicine visits (median score 10, range 5.0-10).

Conclusions: This direct comparison of patient satisfaction with telemedicine visits to previously experienced office visits strongly supports telemedicine care, with patients highlighting convenience, time, and expense. Despite some limitations with telemedicine, physicians expressed highly rated quality-of-service provided.

Citing Articles

Video-Guided Optimization of Stimulation Settings in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Jergas H, Steffen J, Schedlich-Teufer C, Strelow J, Kramme J, Fink G Brain Sci. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39335409 PMC: 11430434. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14090914.


Development of the Digital Inclusion Questionnaire (DIQUEST) in Parkinson's Disease.

Canoro V, Picillo M, Cuoco S, Pellecchia M, Barone P, Erro R Neurol Sci. 2023; 45(3):1063-1069.

PMID: 37843691 PMC: 10857963. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07090-3.


A Comparison of Patients' and Neurologists' Assessments of their Teleneurology Encounter: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Thawani S, Minen M, Grossman S, Friedman S, Bhatt J, Foo F Telemed J E Health. 2023; 30(3):841-849.

PMID: 37624656 PMC: 11386999. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0168.


Racial disparities in access to DBS: results of a real-world U.S. claims data analysis.

Frassica M, Kern D, Afshari M, Connolly A, Wu C, Rowland N Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1233684.

PMID: 37602243 PMC: 10433186. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1233684.


Remote Assessment of Parkinson's Disease Patients Amidst the COVID-19 Lockdown in Mexico.

Leon-Garcia R, Ortega-Robles E, Arias-Carrion O Brain Sci. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37509044 PMC: 10377101. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13071114.


References
1.
George B, Scoglio N, Reminick J, Rajan B, Beck C, Seidmann A . Telemedicine in Leading US Neurology Departments. Neurohospitalist. 2013; 2(4):123-8. PMC: 3726111. DOI: 10.1177/1941874412450716. View

2.
Wilkinson J, Spindler M, Wood S, Marcus S, Weintraub D, Morley J . High patient satisfaction with telehealth in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled study. Neurol Clin Pract. 2016; 6(3):241-251. PMC: 4909521. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000252. View

3.
Ray Dorsey E, Topol E . State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(2):154-61. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705. View

4.
Korn R, Wagle Shukla A, Katz M, Keenan H, Goldenthal S, Auinger P . Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A multicenter noncontrolled cohort. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017; 7(4):283-295. PMC: 5566796. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000371. View