» Articles » PMID: 30746356

Oncologic Evaluation of Obesity As a Factor in Patients with Rectal Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: a Propensity-matched Analysis Using Body Mass Index

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Feb 13
PMID 30746356
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the oncologic impact of obesity, as determined by body mass index (BMI), in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods: The records of 483 patients with stage I-III rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery between June 2003 and December 2011 were reviewed. A matching model based on BMI was constructed to balance obese and nonobese patients. Cox hazard regression models for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were used for multivariate analyses. Additional analysis using visceral fat area (VFA) measurement was performed for matched patients. The threshold for obesity was BMI ≥ 25 kg/m or VFA ≥ 130 cm.

Results: The score matching model yielded 119 patients with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m (the obese group) and 119 patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m (the nonobese group). Surgical outcomes including operation time, estimated blood loss, nil per os periods, and length of hospital stay did not differ between the obese and the nonobese group. The retrieved lymph node numbers and pathologic CRM positive rate were also similar in between the 2 groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 3-126 months), OS and DFS rates were similar between the 2 groups. A tumor location-adjusted model for overall surgical complications showed that a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m were not risk factors. Multivariable analyses for OS and DFS showed no significant association with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m.

Conclusion: Obesity was not associated with long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in the Asian population.

Citing Articles

Underweight as a Risk Factor for Major Intra-abdominal Malignancy Surgeries.

Lim J, Ke Y, Hwang N Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71835.

PMID: 39559639 PMC: 11570910. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71835.


Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for visceral obesity in mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Zhao S, Li R, Zhou J, Sun L, Sun Q, Wang W J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):178.

PMID: 38642232 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01945-3.


Does the visceral fat area impact the histopathology specimen metrics after total mesorectal excision for distal rectal cancer?.

Gachabayov M, Felsenreich D, Bhatti S, Bergamaschi R Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):257.

PMID: 37389686 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02981-7.


Impact of obesity on patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand.

Yang P, Ang Z, Badiani S, Berney C, Morgan M Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):163.

PMID: 37289290 PMC: 10250449. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04447-0.


Does the mesorectal fat area impact the histopathology metrics of the specimen in males undergoing TME for distal rectal cancer?.

Felsenreich D, Gachabayov M, Bergamaschi R Updates Surg. 2022; 75(3):581-588.

PMID: 36513913 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01429-9.

References
1.
Inui A . Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: current issues in research and management. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52(2):72-91. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.52.2.72. View

2.
. New criteria for 'obesity disease' in Japan. Circ J. 2002; 66(11):987-92. DOI: 10.1253/circj.66.987. View

3.
Calle E, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun M . Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(17):1625-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021423. View

4.
. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9403):157-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. View

5.
Meyerhardt J, Tepper J, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, David McCollum A, Brady D . Impact of body mass index on outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer: findings from Intergroup Trial 0114. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(4):648-57. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.121. View