» Articles » PMID: 30743247

Biofabrication Strategies for Creating Microvascular Complexity

Overview
Journal Biofabrication
Date 2019 Feb 12
PMID 30743247
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Design and fabrication of effective biomimetic vasculatures constitutes a relevant and yet unsolved challenge, lying at the heart of tissue repair and regeneration strategies. Even if cell growth is achieved in 3D tissue scaffolds or advanced implants, tissue viability inevitably requires vascularization, as diffusion can only transport nutrients and eliminate debris within a few hundred microns. This engineered vasculature may need to mimic the intricate branching geometry of native microvasculature, referred to herein as vascular complexity, to efficiently deliver blood and recreate critical interactions between the vascular and perivascular cells as well as parenchymal tissues. This review first describes the importance of vascular complexity in labs- and organs-on-chips, the biomechanical and biochemical signals needed to create and maintain a complex vasculature, and the limitations of current 2D, 2.5D, and 3D culture systems in recreating vascular complexity. We then critically review available strategies for design and biofabrication of complex vasculatures in cell culture platforms, labs- and organs-on-chips, and tissue engineering scaffolds, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, challenges and future directions are outlined with the hope of inspiring researchers to create the reliable, efficient and sustainable tools needed for design and biofabrication of complex vasculatures.

Citing Articles

Vascularized organoid-on-a-chip: design, imaging, and analysis.

Yu T, Yang Q, Peng B, Gu Z, Zhu D Angiogenesis. 2024; 27(2):147-172.

PMID: 38409567 DOI: 10.1007/s10456-024-09905-z.


Bioengineering the Vascularized Endocrine Pancreas: A Fine-Tuned Interplay Between Vascularization, Extracellular-Matrix-Based Scaffold Architecture, and Insulin-Producing Cells.

Pignatelli C, Campo F, Neroni A, Piemonti L, Citro A Transpl Int. 2022; 35:10555.

PMID: 36090775 PMC: 9452644. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10555.


Auxetic Metamaterials for Biomedical Devices: Current Situation, Main Challenges, and Research Trends.

Lvov V, Senatov F, Veveris A, Skrybykina V, Diaz Lantada A Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(4).

PMID: 35207976 PMC: 8874587. DOI: 10.3390/ma15041439.


Bioprinting of Complex Multicellular Organs with Advanced Functionality-Recent Progress and Challenges Ahead.

Bertassoni L Adv Mater. 2022; 34(3):e2101321.

PMID: 35060652 PMC: 10171718. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202101321.


Carbon-Based Materials for Articular Tissue Engineering: From Innovative Scaffolding Materials toward Engineered Living Carbon.

Islam M, Diaz Lantada A, Mager D, Korvink J Adv Healthc Mater. 2021; 11(1):e2101834.

PMID: 34601815 PMC: 11469261. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202101834.


References
1.
Kim C, Kasuya J, Jeon J, Chung S, Kamm R . A quantitative microfluidic angiogenesis screen for studying anti-angiogenic therapeutic drugs. Lab Chip. 2014; 15(1):301-10. PMC: 4311754. DOI: 10.1039/c4lc00866a. View

2.
Buyukhatipoglu K, Chang R, Sun W, Clyne A . Bioprinted nanoparticles for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009; 16(4):631-42. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0280. View

3.
Galie P, van Oosten A, Chen C, Janmey P . Application of multiple levels of fluid shear stress to endothelial cells plated on polyacrylamide gels. Lab Chip. 2015; 15(4):1205-12. PMC: 4500630. DOI: 10.1039/c4lc01236d. View

4.
Almeida H, Bartolo P . Virtual topological optimisation of scaffolds for rapid prototyping. Med Eng Phys. 2010; 32(7):775-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.05.001. View

5.
Zakrzewicz A, Secomb T, Pries A . Angioadaptation: keeping the vascular system in shape. News Physiol Sci. 2002; 17:197-201. DOI: 10.1152/nips.01395.2001. View