» Articles » PMID: 30740280

Efficient Computation of Cartilage Contact Pressures Within Dynamic Simulations of Movement

Overview
Date 2019 Feb 12
PMID 30740280
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the use of an advanced collision detection algorithm to simulate cartilage contact pressure patterns within dynamic musculoskeletal simulations of movement. We created a knee model that included articular cartilage contact for the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. Knee mechanics were then predicted within the context of a dynamic gait simulation. At each time step of a simulation, ray-casting was used in conjunction with hierarchical oriented bounding boxes (OBB) to rapidly identify regions of overlap between articulating cartilage surfaces. Local cartilage contact pressure was then computed using an elastic foundation model. Collision detection implemented in parallel on a GPU provided up to a 10× speed increase when using high resolution mesh densities that had >10 triangles/mm. However, pressure magnitudes converged at considerably lower mesh densities (2.6 triangles/mm) where CPU and GPU implementations of collision detection exhibited equivalent performance. Simulated tibiofemoral contact locations were comparable to prior experimental measurements, while pressure magnitudes were similar to those predicted by finite element models. We conclude the use of ray-casting with hierarchical OBB for collision detection is a viable method for simulating joint contact mechanics in human movement.

Citing Articles

Patient-specific gait pattern in individuals with patellofemoral instability reduces knee joint loads.

Guggenberger B, Horsak B, Habersack A, Kruse A, Smith C, Kainz H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28520.

PMID: 39557996 PMC: 11574134. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79021-x.


Modeling of the Effect of Subperiosteal Hydrostatic Pressure Conductivity between Joints on Decreasing Contact Loads on Cartilage and of the Effect of Myofascial Relief in Treating Trigger Points: The Floating Skeleton Theory.

Pitkin M Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 38667233 PMC: 11048457. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9040222.


Development and validation of a novel ankle joint musculoskeletal model.

Liu T, Dimitrov A, Jomha N, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Westover L Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62(5):1395-1407.

PMID: 38194185 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-023-03010-x.


Signatures of disease progression in knee osteoarthritis: insights from an integrated multi-scale modeling approach, a proof of concept.

Mohout I, Elahi S, Esrafilian A, Killen B, Korhonen R, Verschueren S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1214693.

PMID: 37576991 PMC: 10413555. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1214693.


Monitoring Knee Contact Force with Force-Sensing Insoles.

Spencer A, Samaan M, Noehren B Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(10).

PMID: 37430813 PMC: 10223214. DOI: 10.3390/s23104900.


References
1.
Haraguchi N, Armiger R, Myerson M, Campbell J, Chao E . Prediction of three-dimensional contact stress and ligament tension in the ankle during stance determined from computational modeling. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30(2):177-85. DOI: 10.3113/FAI-2009-0177. View

2.
Smith C, Lenhart R, Kaiser J, Vignos M, Thelen D . Influence of Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Mechanics in Walking. J Knee Surg. 2015; 29(2):99-106. PMC: 4755512. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558858. View

3.
Bei Y, Fregly B . Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics. Med Eng Phys. 2004; 26(9):777-89. PMC: 1680082. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.07.004. View

4.
Liu F, Kozanek M, Hosseini A, Van de Velde S, Gill T, Rubash H . In vivo tibiofemoral cartilage deformation during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 2009; 43(4):658-65. PMC: 2823844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.028. View

5.
Caruntu D, Hefzy M . 3-D anatomically based dynamic modeling of the human knee to include tibio-femoral and patello-femoral joints. J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126(1):44-53. DOI: 10.1115/1.1644565. View