» Articles » PMID: 30738545

Meta-Analyses: Key Parenting Program Components for Disruptive Child Behavior

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Date 2019 Feb 11
PMID 30738545
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Parenting programs are the recommended strategy for the prevention and treatment of disruptive child behavior. Similar to most psychosocial interventions, it is unknown which components of parenting programs (ie, parenting techniques taught) actually contribute to program effects. Identifying what parents need to be taught to reduce disruptive child behavior can optimize intervention strategies, and refine theories on how parenting shapes disruptive child behavior.

Method: In two meta-analyses, we updated the evidence-base for effectiveness of parenting programs delivered at various levels of prevention and treatment of disruptive behavior. We searched six databases (eg, PsycINFO, MEDLINE) for randomized trials and coded the parenting techniques taught in each program. We identified the techniques associated with program effects in general, and for prevention versus treatment, and immediate versus longer-term effects, specifically.

Results: Parenting program effects on disruptive behavior gradually increased per level of prevention (universal d = -0.21, selective d = -0.27, indicated d = -0.55) and treatment (d = -0.69) (Meta-Analysis 1: 154 trials, 398 effect sizes). Three of 26 parenting techniques were associated with stronger program effects: positive reinforcement, praise in particular, and natural/logical consequences. Several additional techniques (eg, relationship building and parental self-management) were associated with stronger effects in treatment but weaker effects in prevention. No techniques were associated with stronger longer-term effects (Meta-Analysis 2: 42 trials, 157 effect sizes).

Conclusion: Positive reinforcement and nonviolent discipline techniques (eg, applying natural/logical consequences) seem to be key parenting program techniques to reduce disruptive child behavior. Additional techniques (eg, parental self-management skills) might improve program effects in treatment, but not in prevention.

Citing Articles

Comparing Digital Versus Face-to-Face Delivery of Systemic Psychotherapy Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Erasmus P, Borrmann M, Becker J, Kuchinke L, Meinlschmidt G Interact J Med Res. 2025; 14:e46441.

PMID: 39993307 PMC: 11894358. DOI: 10.2196/46441.


Outcome preferences in fidelity-adaptation scenarios across evidence-based parenting programs: A discrete choice experiment.

Pettersson K, Millroth P, Giannotta F, Liedgren P, Lyon A, Hasson H Implement Sci. 2025; 20(1):10.

PMID: 39966975 PMC: 11837681. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-025-01421-y.


Attachment, behavior problems and interventions.

Hutchings J, Williams M, Leijten P Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025; 2():1156407.

PMID: 39816864 PMC: 11731626. DOI: 10.3389/frcha.2023.1156407.


A Novel Approach to Research Synthesis with the Distillation and Matching Model: Application to the Prevention of Youth Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems.

Oddo L, McLeod B, Sutherland K, Chow J, Ledford J, Li G Prev Sci. 2025; 26(1):69-79.

PMID: 39777638 PMC: 11811484. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-025-01766-2.


Identifying Active Ingredients that Cause Change in Digital Parent Training Programs for Child Behavior Problems: A Qualitative Exploration.

Saar C, Brandes O, Baumel A Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024; .

PMID: 39673577 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-024-01803-1.