» Articles » PMID: 30738284

Cancer Diagnostic Delays and Travel Distance to Health Services: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Oncology
Public Health
Date 2019 Feb 10
PMID 30738284
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aims to investigate the association between distance to health services and intervals in the cancer diagnostic pathway, and explore whether the diagnostic difficulty of the cancer influences this association.

Method: A nationwide cohort study was conducted based on data from both questionnaires and registries. Danish cancer patients diagnosed in 2005-2016 and their general practitioner (GP) were included if enrolled in the Danish Cancer in Primary Care (CaP) cohort (n = 37,872). The CaP cohorts provided data on intervals assessed by patients and GPs. The Geographical Information System (GIS) was used to calculate travel distances from the residence of the patient to their GP surgery and to the hospital of diagnosis.

Results: Longer travel distance to the hospital of diagnosis was associated with longer diagnostic interval. This association was strongest in the period before the implementation of Cancer Patient Pathways (CPP) in 2010. Patients with a cancer categorised as ´hard to diagnose´ contributed mostly to the association. Longer travel distance to the GP was associated with shorter patient interval and primary care interval for patients diagnosed with cancer types ´intermediate to diagnose´.

Conclusion: Travel distance to cancer diagnostic health care services was associated with interval length in the diagnostic pathway. This association was less pronounced in the period after introducing CPPs and also strongly depending of the underlying cancer type and symptomatology.

Citing Articles

Quality indicators and development targets in the national clinical quality registries in cancer care and screening.

Simoni A, Ahlstrom L, Ording A, Iversen L, Johnsen S, Jensen J BMJ Open Qual. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39755562 PMC: 11751976. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003019.


Analysis of travel burden and travel support among patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center in the Southeastern United States.

Bai J, Barandouzi Z, Yeager K, Graetz I, Gong C, Norman M Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(7):451.

PMID: 38907006 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08656-3.


Assessing the Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastric Cancer Mortality Risk.

Shigenobu Y, Miyamori D, Ikeda K, Yoshida S, Kikuchi Y, Kanno K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337409 PMC: 10856106. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030715.


Danish general practitioners as gatekeepers for gynaecological patients in regions with different density of resident specialists in gynaecology: in which situations and to whom do they refer? A cross-sectional study.

Laschke A, Blaakaer J, Jensen C, Larsen M Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023; 41(1):52-60.

PMID: 36633427 PMC: 10088933. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2165085.


The impact of patient travel time on disparities in treatment for early stage lung cancer in California.

Obrochta C, Parada Jr H, Murphy J, Nara A, Trinidad D, Happy Araneta M PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0272076.

PMID: 36197902 PMC: 9534452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272076.