» Articles » PMID: 30733771

Transgenic Approaches for Genetic Improvement in Groundnut ( L.) Against Major Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Feb 9
PMID 30733771
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cultivated groundnut ( L.) is considered as one of the primary oilseed crops and a major fodder for cattle industry in most of the developing countries, owing to its rich source of protein. It is due to its geocarpic nature of growth that the overall yield performance of groundnut is hindered by several biotic and abiotic stress factors. Multidimensional attempts were undertaken to combat these factors by developing superior groundnut varieties, modified with integral mechanism of tolerance/resistance; however this approach proved to be futile, owing to inferior pod and kernel quality. As a superior alternative, biotechnological intervention like transformation of foreign genes, either directly (biolistic) or via , significantly aided in the development of advanced groundnut genotypes equipped with integral resistance against stresses and enhanced yield attributing traits. Several genes triggered by biotic and abiotic stresses, were detected and some of them were cloned and transformed as major parts of transgenic programmes. Application of modern molecular biological techniques, in designing biotic and abiotic stress tolerant/resistant groundnut varieties that exhibited mechanisms of resistance, relied on the expression of specific genes associated to particular stress. The genetically transformed stress tolerant groundnut varieties possess the potential to be employed as donor parents in traditional breeding programmes for developing varieties that are resilient to fungal, bacterial, and viral diseases, as well as to draught and salinity. The present review emphasizes on the retrospect and prospect of genetic transformation tools, implemented for the enhancement of groundnut varieties against key biotic and abiotic stress factors.

Citing Articles

Ectopic expression of 's vacuolar Na/H antiporter gene () in indica rice ( L.).

Hasan M, Bhuiyan F, Hoque H, Jewel N, Ashrafuzzaman M, Prodhan S Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2022; 35:e00740.

PMID: 35646621 PMC: 9130519. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00740.


An Improvised Hairy Root Transformation Method for Efficient Gene Silencing in Roots and Nodules of Arachis hypogaea.

Raul B, Sinharoy S Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2408:303-316.

PMID: 35325431 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1875-2_20.


Transgenic Breeding Approaches for Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives.

Anwar A, Kim J Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(8).

PMID: 32295026 PMC: 7216248. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21082695.


Mutagenesis of FAD2 genes in peanut with CRISPR/Cas9 based gene editing.

Yuan M, Zhu J, Gong L, He L, Lee C, Han S BMC Biotechnol. 2019; 19(1):24.

PMID: 31035982 PMC: 6489235. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0516-8.

References
1.
Bhatnagar M, Prasad K, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Narasu M, Waliyar F, Sharma K . An efficient method for the production of marker-free transgenic plants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2010; 29(5):495-502. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-010-0838-4. View

2.
Wang A, Fan H, Singsit C, Ozias-Akins P . Transformation of peanut with a soybean vspB promoter-uidA chimeric gene. I. Optimization of a transformation system and analysis of GUS expression in primary transgenic tissues and plants. Physiol Plant. 2022; 102(1):38-48. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1020106.x. View

3.
Miki B, McHugh S . Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety. J Biotechnol. 2004; 107(3):193-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.011. View

4.
Eapen S, George L . Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated gene transfer in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2013; 13(10):582-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00234516. View

5.
Swathi Anuradha T, Jami S, Datla R, Kirti P . Genetic transformation of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using cotyledonary node as explant and a promoterless gus::nptII fusion gene based vector. J Biosci. 2006; 31(2):235-46. DOI: 10.1007/BF02703916. View