» Articles » PMID: 30730469

A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation

Overview
Journal Simul Healthc
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Feb 8
PMID 30730469
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: With the growth of telehealth, simulation personnel will be called upon to support training that integrates these new technologies and processes. We sought to integrate remote telehealth electronic intensive care unit (eICU) personnel into in situ simulations with rural emergency department (ED) care teams. We describe how we overcame technical challenges of creating shared awareness of the patient's condition and the care team's progress among those executing the simulation, the care team, and the eICU.

Methods: The objective of the simulations was to introduce telehealth technology and new processes of engaging the eICU via telehealth during sepsis care in 2 rural EDs. Scenario development included experts in sepsis, telehealth, and emergency medicine. We describe the operational systems challenges, alternatives considered, and solutions used. Participants completed surveys on self-confidence presimulation/postsimulation in using telehealth and in managing patients with sepsis (1-10 Likert scale, with 10 "completely confident"). Pre-post responses were compared by two-tailed paired t test.

Results: We successfully engaged the staff of two EDs: 42 nurses, 9 physicians or advanced practice providers, and 9 technicians (N = 60). We used a shared in situ simulation clinical actions observational checklist, created within an off-the-shelf survey software program, completed during the simulations by an on-site observer, and shared with the eICU team via teleconferencing software, to message and cue eICU nurse engagement. The eICU nurse also participated in debriefing via the telehealth video system with successful simulation engagement. These solutions avoided interfering with real ED or eICU operations. The postsimulation mean ± SD ratings of confidence using telehealth increased from 5.3 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ3.5, P < 0.05) and in managing patients with sepsis increased from 7.1 ± 2.5 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ1.8, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: We created shared awareness between remote eICU personnel and in situ simulations in rural EDs via a low-cost method using survey software combined with teleconferencing methods.

Citing Articles

Telehealth in emergency medicine: A consensus conference to map the intersection of telehealth and emergency medicine.

Hayden E, Davis C, Clark S, Joshi A, Krupinski E, Naik N Acad Emerg Med. 2021; 28(12):1452-1474.

PMID: 34245649 PMC: 11150898. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14330.


Simulation-based team training in time-critical clinical presentations in emergency medicine and critical care: a review of the literature.

Weile J, Nebsbjerg M, Ovesen S, Paltved C, Ingeman M Adv Simul (Lond). 2021; 6(1):3.

PMID: 33472706 PMC: 7816464. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-021-00154-4.


A novel in situ simulation framework for introduction of a new technology: the 3-Act-3-Debrief model.

Barker L, Bond W, Vincent A, Cooley K, McGarvey J, Vozenilek J Adv Simul (Lond). 2020; 5:25.

PMID: 32999737 PMC: 7519488. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-020-00145-x.

References
1.
Levy M, Dellinger R, Townsend S, Linde-Zwirble W, Marshall J, Bion J . The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(2):222-31. PMC: 2826633. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1738-3. View

2.
Joseph V, West R, Shickle D, Keen J, Clamp S . Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects. J Telemed Telecare. 2010; 17(2):71-7. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100315. View

3.
Ahmed R, Atkinson S, Gable B, Yee J, Gardner A . Coaching From the Sidelines: Examining the Impact of Teledebriefing in Simulation-Based Training. Simul Healthc. 2016; 11(5):334-339. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000177. View

4.
Auerbach M, Kessler D, Patterson M . The use of in situ simulation to detect latent safety threats in paediatrics: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2022; 1(3):77-82. PMC: 8936670. DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000037. View

5.
Kobayashi L, Shapiro M, Sucov A, Woolard R, Boss 3rd R, Dunbar J . Portable advanced medical simulation for new emergency department testing and orientation. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(6):691-5. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.01.023. View