» Articles » PMID: 30723254

A Beginner's Guide to Data Stewardship and Data Sharing

Overview
Journal Spinal Cord
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Feb 7
PMID 30723254
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: A narrative review of principles, benefits and disadvantages, as well as methods of research data sharing.

Objectives: To assist prospective Spinal Cord authors and others with understanding and implementing data sharing, so that various benefits of such sharing can accrue to all spinal cord injury research stakeholders.

Setting: International.

Methods: The medical research and health care services literature was reviewed nonsystematically for relevant articles, and web sites were explored for information and services offered by various pertinent organizations.

Results: Grant makers, professional organizations, research journals, publishers, and other entities in the research field increasingly stress the ethics as well as societal and practical benefits of data sharing, and require researchers to do so within a reasonable time after data collection ends. Sharing data, retrospectively, generally requires much time and resources, but when a data management plan is part of a research proposal from the start, costs are limited, and grant makers allow these costs to be part of a budget. There are many organizations that offer information on or even assist with preparing data for sharing and actual deposit in a data repository.

Conclusions: The requirement of data sharing is not likely to go away, and researchers interested in submitting their reports to Spinal Cord would do well to familiarize themselves with the myriad practical issues involved in preparing data for sharing.

Citing Articles

The challenges of research data management in cardiovascular science: a DGK and DZHK position paper-executive summary.

Steffens S, Schroder K, Kruger M, Maack C, Streckfuss-Bomeke K, Backs J Clin Res Cardiol. 2023; 113(5):672-679.

PMID: 37847314 PMC: 11026239. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02303-3.


Big Brain Data Initiatives in Universiti Sains Malaysia: Data Stewardship to Data Repository and Data Sharing.

Hamzah N, Hashimah Ahamed Hassain Malim N, Abdullah J, Sumari P, Mokhtar A, Rosli S Neuroinformatics. 2023; 21(3):589-600.

PMID: 37344699 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-023-09637-3.


Predicting 30-Day Readmission Risk for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Through a Federated Machine Learning Architecture on Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) Data: Development and Validation Study.

Alvarez-Romero C, Martinez-Garcia A, Ternero Vega J, Diaz-Jimenez P, Jimenez-Juan C, Nieto-Martin M JMIR Med Inform. 2022; 10(6):e35307.

PMID: 35653170 PMC: 9204581. DOI: 10.2196/35307.


Discoverability of information on clinical trial data-sharing platforms.

Wilson P, Huser V J Med Libr Assoc. 2021; 109(2):240-247.

PMID: 34285666 PMC: 8270348. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.992.


Physiotherapy interventions for the treatment of spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Barbosa P, Glinsky J, Fachin-Martins E, Harvey L Spinal Cord. 2021; 59(3):236-247.

PMID: 33564117 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-00610-4.


References
1.
Hesse B . Can psychology walk the walk of open science?. Am Psychol. 2018; 73(2):126-137. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000197. View

2.
Dyke S, Saulnier K, Pastinen T, Bourque G, Joly Y . Evolving data access policy: The Canadian context. Facets (Ott). 2016; 1(1):138-147. PMC: 5158303. DOI: 10.1139/facets-2016-0002. View

3.
Ioannidis J, Greenland S, Hlatky M, Khoury M, Macleod M, Moher D . Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014; 383(9912):166-75. PMC: 4697939. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8. View

4.
McDonald L, Schultze A, Simpson A, Graham S, Wasiak R, Ramagopalan S . Lack of data sharing in observational studies. BMJ. 2017; 359:j4866. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4866. View

5.
Cummings J, Zagrodney J, Day T . Impact of Open Data Policies on Consent to Participate in Human Subjects Research: Discrepancies between Participant Action and Reported Concerns. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0125208. PMC: 4439026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125208. View