Time Preferences Are Reliable Across Time-horizons and Verbal Versus Experiential Tasks

Overview

Journal Elife

Specialty Biology

Date 2019 Feb 6

PMID 30719974

Citations 5

Authors

Evgeniya Lukinova

Yuyue Wang

Steven F Lehrer

Jeffrey C Erlich

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Editorial Note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).

Citing Articles

What Can Reinforcement Learning Models of Dopamine and Serotonin Tell Us about the Action of Antidepressants?.

Lan D, Browning M Comput Psychiatr. 2024; 6(1):166-188.

PMID: 38774776 PMC: 11104395. DOI: 10.5334/cpsy.83.

Discounting of Future Rewards and Punishments in Rats.

Zech M, Schable S, Kalenscher T eNeuro. 2022; 9(6).

PMID: 36411053 PMC: 9718352. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0452-21.2022.

Quantifying the contribution of individual variation in timing to delay-discounting.

Lukinova E, Erlich J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):18354.

PMID: 34526520 PMC: 8443764. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97496-w.

Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task.

Patt V, Hunsberger R, Jones D, Keane M, Verfaellie M PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251480.

PMID: 33989315 PMC: 8121536. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251480.

Effect of Presentation Format on Judgment of Long-Range Time Intervals.

Agostino C, Zana Y, Balci F, Claessens P Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1479.

PMID: 31316436 PMC: 6611061. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01479.

References

Ahn W, Ramesh D, Moeller F, Vassileva J . Utility of Machine-Learning Approaches to Identify Behavioral Markers for Substance Use Disorders: Impulsivity Dimensions as Predictors of Current Cocaine Dependence. Front Psychiatry. 2016; 7:34. PMC: 4785183. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00034. View

Tymula A, Rosenberg Belmaker L, Ruderman L, Glimcher P, Levy I . Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(42):17143-8. PMC: 3801020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309909110. View

Vanderveldt A, Oliveira L, Green L . Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016; 42(2):141-62. PMC: 4824649. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000097. View

Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P . Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999; 25(2):418-27. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.2.418. View

Kelleher R, Gollub L . A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962; 5:543-97. PMC: 1404082. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543. View

Peirce J . PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 162(1-2):8-13. PMC: 2018741. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017. View

Huang L, Rattner A, Liu H, Nathans J . How to draw the line in biomedical research. Elife. 2013; 2:e00638. PMC: 3601633. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00638. View

Constantinople C, Piet A, Brody C . An Analysis of Decision under Risk in Rats. Curr Biol. 2019; 29(12):2066-2074.e5. PMC: 6863753. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.013. View

Redish A, Jensen S, Johnson A . A unified framework for addiction: vulnerabilities in the decision process. Behav Brain Sci. 2008; 31(4):415-37. PMC: 3774323. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0800472X. View

10.

Johnson M, Bickel W . Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002; 77(2):129-46. PMC: 1284852. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129. View

11.

McClure S, Ericson K, Laibson D, Loewenstein G, Cohen J . Time discounting for primary rewards. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(21):5796-804. PMC: 6672764. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4246-06.2007. View

12.

Johnson P, Herrmann E, Johnson M . Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014; 103(1):87-107. PMC: 4428151. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.110. View

13.

Akerlund D, Golsteyn B, Gronqvist H, Lindahl L . Time discounting and criminal behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(22):6160-5. PMC: 4896668. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522445113. View

14.

McClure S, Laibson D, Loewenstein G, Cohen J . Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004; 306(5695):503-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100907. View

15.

Huang J, Zhong Z, Wang M, Chen X, Tan Y, Zhang S . Circadian modulation of dopamine levels and dopaminergic neuron development contributes to attention deficiency and hyperactive behavior. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(6):2572-87. PMC: 4323534. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2551-14.2015. View

16.

Reynolds B, Schiffbauer R . Measuring state changes in human delay discounting: an experiential discounting task. Behav Processes. 2004; 67(3):343-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.06.003. View

17.

Cai X, Kim S, Lee D . Heterogeneous coding of temporally discounted values in the dorsal and ventral striatum during intertemporal choice. Neuron. 2011; 69(1):170-82. PMC: 3034314. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.041. View

18.

Louie K, Glimcher P, Webb R . Adaptive neural coding: from biological to behavioral decision-making. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016; 5:91-99. PMC: 4692189. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.08.008. View

19.

Schoenbaum G, Roesch M, Stalnaker T, Takahashi Y . A new perspective on the role of the orbitofrontal cortex in adaptive behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(12):885-92. PMC: 2835299. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2753. View

20.

Mills C, Christoff K . Finding Consistency in Boredom by Appreciating its Instability. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018; 22(9):744-747. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.001. View