» Articles » PMID: 30715549

The Neurobiology of Taboo Language Processing: FMRI Evidence During Spoken Word Production

Overview
Date 2019 Feb 5
PMID 30715549
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Every language has words deemed to be socially inappropriate or 'taboo' to utter. Taboo word production appears prominently in language disorders following brain injury. Yet, we know little about the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in processing taboo compared to neutral language. In the present study, we introduced taboo distractor words in the picture word interference paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how these words influence spoken word production. Taboo distractor words significantly slowed picture-naming latencies compared to neutral words. This interference effect was associated with increased blood oxygen level dependent signal across a distributed thalamo-cortical network including bilateral anterior cingulate cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus, left posterior middle temporal gyrus and right thalamus. We interpret our findings as being consistent with an account integrating both domain-general attention-capture/distractor blocking and language-specific mechanisms in processing taboo words during spoken word production.

Citing Articles

Cortico-Cerebellar Monitoring of Speech Sequence Production.

Todorovic S, Anton J, Sein J, Nazarian B, Chanoine V, Rauchbauer B Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024; 5(3):701-721.

PMID: 39175789 PMC: 11338302. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00113.


Power and vulnerability: managing sensitive language in organizational communication.

Healey P, Khare P, Castro I, Tyson G, Karan M, Shekhar R Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1266425.

PMID: 38463643 PMC: 10922920. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266425.


Predictive Coding and Internal Error Correction in Speech Production.

Teghipco A, Okada K, Murphy E, Hickok G Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 4(1):81-119.

PMID: 37229143 PMC: 10205072. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00088.


Running away from phonological ambiguity, we stumble upon our words: Laboratory induced slips show differences between highly and lowly defensive people.

Thieffry L, Olyff G, Pioda L, Detandt S, Bazan A Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1033671.

PMID: 37063107 PMC: 10091465. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1033671.


Multi-model mapping of phonemic fluency.

Cipolotti L, Xu T, Harry B, Mole J, Lakey G, Shallice T Brain Commun. 2021; 3(4):fcab232.

PMID: 34693285 PMC: 8530259. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab232.


References
1.
Freire L, Roche A, Mangin J . What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002; 21(5):470-84. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2002.1009383. View

2.
De Fockert J, Theeuwes J . Role of frontal cortex in attentional capture by singleton distractors. Brain Cogn. 2012; 80(3):367-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.07.006. View

3.
Piai V, Roelofs A, Acheson D, Takashima A . Attention for speaking: domain-general control from the anterior cingulate cortex in spoken word production. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:832. PMC: 3856851. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00832. View

4.
Mohanty A, Engels A, Herrington J, Heller W, Ho M, Banich M . Differential engagement of anterior cingulate cortex subdivisions for cognitive and emotional function. Psychophysiology. 2007; 44(3):343-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00515.x. View

5.
Hansen S, McMahon K, Burt J, de Zubicaray G . The locus of taboo context effects in picture naming. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015; 70(1):75-91. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1124895. View