» Articles » PMID: 30709642

Strain Distribution of the Anterolateral Ligament During Internal Rotation at Different Knee Flexion Angles: A Biomechanical Study on Human Cadavers

Overview
Journal Knee
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Feb 3
PMID 30709642
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Injuries of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) are fairly common in patients with ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Before considering repair or reconstruction of the ALL, the lack of knowledge with regard to the biomechanical behavior of this ligament must be considered. The purpose of this study was to analyze the strain of the ALL induced by tibial internal rotation at different flexion angles and find out the strain distribution features.

Methods: The ALLs of ten fresh-frozen cadaver knees were dissected. All specimens underwent tibial internal rotation from 0° to 25° at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of knee flexion. Strain distribution of the ALL during internal rotation was recorded by digital image correlation (DIC). The overall strain and sub-regional strain were measured.

Results: The strain of the ALL increased with increasing tibial internal rotation. With 25° of internal rotation, the overall strain at each flexion angle was 12.89 ± 2.73% (30°), 15.32 ± 2.50% (60°), 18.94 ± 2.34% (90°), and 20.10 ± 3.27% (120°). The sub-regional strain was significantly different at all flexion angles. The strain of the distal 1/3 of the ALL was the greatest, followed by the middle 1/3, while the proximal 1/3 was the smallest (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The ALL resisted internal rotation of the tibia by becoming more tense with increasing rotation. A significantly high strain was observed in the distal portion near the tibial insertion site of the ALL, which may suggest that this region is prone to injury with excessive internal rotation.

Citing Articles

Internal Rotation Measurement of the Knee with Polymer-Based Capacitive Strain Gauges versus Mechanical Rotation Measurement Taking Gender Differences into Account: A Comparative Analysis.

Mayr H, Rosenstiel N, Prakash K, Comella L, Woias P, Schmal H Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38276271 PMC: 10821048. DOI: 10.3390/life14010142.


Shear wave elastography demonstrates different material properties between the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament.

Alzouhayli K, Schilaty N, Wei Y, Hooke A, Sellon J, Bates N Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023; 111:106155.

PMID: 38043170 PMC: 10872362. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106155.


Outcomes of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction According to GNRB Arthrometer Measurement.

Cheng Y, Chiu C, Chen A, Chan Y, Hsu K Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(2).

PMID: 36837568 PMC: 9966521. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020366.


Numerical Analysis of the , with Sprains of Different Degrees after Trauma.

Marquet-Rivera R, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Romero-Angeles B, Hernandez-Vazquez R, Mastache-Miranda O, Cruz-Lopez S Comput Math Methods Med. 2021; 2021:2109348.

PMID: 34349834 PMC: 8328720. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2109348.


High Biofidelity 3D Biomodel Reconstruction from Soft and Hard Tissues (Knee), FEM, and 3D Printing: A Three-Dimensional Methodological Proposal.

Marquet-Rivera R, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Hernandez-Vazquez R, Romero-Angeles B, Mastache-Miranda O, Urriolagoitia-Calderon G Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:6688164.

PMID: 33880378 PMC: 8046528. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6688164.