» Articles » PMID: 30709581

Surgical Technique to Achieve High Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Single Hospital Experience

Overview
Journal Biomed J
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Feb 3
PMID 30709581
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To describe a novel operative technique resulting in extended durability and improved ease of use of current flexible ureteroscopes (FURS). A surgical method employing a modified technique of using an Olympus digital flexible URF-V ureteroscope was developed.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 546 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using this modified approach performed by a single surgeon at our hospital, and investigated the outcome and durability of the ureteroscope.

Results: Through the study period, the URF-V ureteroscope required repair five times in total. During factory maintenance, distal working channel damage was noted twice, and outer bending rubber damage was noted once. The most recent two repairs were required due to laser penetration. Despite the damage and repairs, the deflection system was almost entirely intact after high-frequency use. The durability of FURS determines the efficacy of RIRS for renal stones.

Conclusion: In this report, we described our modified upside-down technique for manipulation of FURS under unequal dual deflection in order to preserve the deflection apparatus, which yielded a greatly prolonged durability. Additionally, the use of mimic drive turning decreased the time needed to train urologists.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of multi-section continuum robotic ureteroscope in the kidney.

Kobayashi S, Masaki F, King F, Wollin D, Kibel A, Hata N J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(4):1411-1420.

PMID: 36689076 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01530-0.


Basal-bolus or premixed? Shedding light on optimal insulin regime for type 1 diabetes.

Louise Walton E Biomed J. 2019; 41(6):337-339.

PMID: 30709574 PMC: 6362169. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.008.

References
1.
Carey R, Gomez C, Maurici G, Lynne C, Leveillee R, Bird V . Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol. 2006; 176(2):607-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.059. View

2.
Somani B, Aboumarzouk O, Srivastava A, Traxer O . Flexible ureterorenoscopy: Tips and tricks. Urol Ann. 2013; 5(1):1-6. PMC: 3643314. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.106869. View

3.
Sung J, Springhart W, Marguet C, LEsperance J, Tan Y, Albala D . Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology. 2005; 66(5):958-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.033. View

4.
Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Nanda B, Kumar N, Das M, Jha S . A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol. 2014; 29(5):575-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0473. View

5.
Ankem M, Lowry P, Slovick R, Rio A, Nakada S . Clinical utility of dual active deflection flexible ureteroscope during upper tract ureteropyeloscopy. Urology. 2004; 64(3):430-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.011. View