» Articles » PMID: 30707250

Diagnostic Effect of the Single BP Cut-Offs for Identifying Elevated BP and Hypertension in Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years

Overview
Journal Pediatr Cardiol
Date 2019 Feb 2
PMID 30707250
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In contrast to the percentile-based definitions of elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension for children and adolescents of all ages in the 2004 fourth report, the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) BP guideline recommends a change to single BP cut-offs for clinical diagnosis (120/< 80-129/< 80 mmHg for elevated BP and ≥ 130/80 mmHg for hypertension) in adolescents aged 13 years and older, and it also recommends researchers using the percentile-based definitions for more precise BP classification. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic effect of the single BP cut-offs for identifying adolescent abnormal BP as compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table by sex, age, and height. Data were from 8287 adolescents aged 13-17 years in NHANES 1999-2016 and 1659 adolescents aged 13-17 years in NHANES III (1988-1994). Compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table, the single BP thresholds performed well for identifying elevated BP in adolescents in NHANES 1999-2016/NHANES III, with high values of area under the curve 0.93/0.95, sensitivity 86.7%/89.9%, specificity 100%/100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%/100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.2%/98.8%, and kappa coefficient 0.92/0.94. The results were similar for identifying hypertension in the two datasets, with especially high PPV 100%/100% and NPV 99.2%/99.2%. However, the sensitivity values of the simple method for identifying hypertension were not satisfactory among girls, younger adolescents, and Hispanic adolescents in both datasets. In conclusion, the single BP cut-offs in general performed similarly well for identifying abnormal BP as compared to 2017 AAP percentile table, but not well in some subgroups.

Citing Articles

A proposal to simplify the definition of pediatric hypertension: bridging the gap between perception and action.

Yang L, Qiao Y, Zhao M, Xi B BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):596.

PMID: 39707332 PMC: 11662420. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03825-x.


Pediatric Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Health in Adulthood.

Meng Y, Mynard J, Smith K, Juonala M, Urbina E, Niiranen T Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024; 26(11):431-450.

PMID: 38878251 PMC: 11455673. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-024-01312-5.


A comparison of paediatric hypertension clinical practice guidelines and their ability to predict adult hypertension in an African birth cohort.

Craig A, Ware L, Mapanga W, Norris S J Hum Hypertens. 2022; 37(6):455-462.

PMID: 35701669 PMC: 10256606. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-022-00709-6.

References
1.
Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Guo S, Grummer-Strawn L, Flegal K, Mei Z . 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002; (246):1-190. View

2.
Kavey R, Daniels S, Lauer R, Atkins D, Hayman L, Taubert K . American Heart Association guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in childhood. Circulation. 2003; 107(11):1562-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000061521.15730.6e. View

3.
. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(2 Suppl 4th Report):555-76. View

4.
Kollias A, Dafni M, Poulidakis E, Ntineri A, Stergiou G . Out-of-office blood pressure and target organ damage in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2014; 32(12):2315-31. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000384. View

5.
McQuillan G, McLean J, Chiappa M, Corporation H, Lukacs S . National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Biospecimen Program: NHANES III (1988-1994) and NHANES 1999-2014. Vital Health Stat 2. 2015; (170):1-14. View