» Articles » PMID: 30707130

Pre-Use Ureteroscope Contamination After High Level Disinfection: Reprocessing Effectiveness and the Relation with Cumulative Ureteroscope Use

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Feb 2
PMID 30707130
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the frequency of preoperative and persistent microbial contamination of flexible ureteroscopes after reprocessing and the relation of contamination to cumulative ureteroscope use.

Materials And Methods: We evaluated the effectiveness of high level disinfection with peracetic acid as well as data on ureteroscope use for 20 new flexible ureteroscopes from December 2015 to December 2017 at a single center. In the operating room pre-use and postuse microbial samples of the ureteroscope shaft and working channel were collected to evaluate microbial contamination after reprocessing. Positive cultures were defined as 30 cfu/ml or greater of skin flora, or 10 cfu/ml or greater of uropathogenic microorganisms. A generalized estimating equation model was used to analyze whether cumulative ureteroscope use was associated with positive pre-use cultures.

Results: Microbial samples were collected during 389 procedures. Pre-use ureteroscope cultures were positive in 47 of 389 procedures (12.1%), of which uropathogens were found in 9 of 389 (2.3%) and skin flora in 38 of 389 (9.8%). Urinary tract infection symptoms did not develop in any of the patients who underwent surgery with a uropathogen contaminated ureteroscope. In 1 case the pre-use culture contained the same bacteria type as the prior postuse culture. Cumulative ureteroscope use was not associated with a higher probability of positive cultures.

Conclusions: Microbial contamination of reprocessed ureteroscopes was found in an eighth of all procedures. Notably uropathogenic microorganisms were discovered in a small proportion of all procedures. Persistent ureteroscope contamination with uropathogens was only rarely encountered. Cumulative ureteroscope use was not associated with a higher probability of microbial contamination.

Citing Articles

Ureteral stent encrustation in an HIV patient treated with disposable flexible ureteroscope: a case report.

Xiong L, Loo N, Lu Z, Xu X, Wei G Pan Afr Med J. 2024; 47:145.

PMID: 38933433 PMC: 11204988. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.145.39961.


Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Difficult Is It Today to Stay Up to Date? A Pictorial Review of Instruments Available in Europe in 2023.

Vaccaro C, Lorusso V, Palmisano F, Rosso M, Nicola M, Granata A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137717 PMC: 10743947. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247648.


Single use flexible ureteroscopes: Current status and future directions.

Juliebo-Jones P, Ventimiglia E, Somani B, Asoy M, Gjengsto P, Beisland C BJUI Compass. 2023; 4(6):613-621.

PMID: 37818020 PMC: 10560621. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.265.


Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal.

Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Hughes T, Juliebo-Jones P, Somani B Res Rep Urol. 2023; 15:131-139.

PMID: 37069942 PMC: 10105588. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S386844.


Ureterolithiasis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Patients Treated with Single-Use Ureteroscope: A Case Report.

Xiong L, Loo N, Lu Z, Xu X, Wei G Am J Case Rep. 2022; 23:e938608.

PMID: 36567520 PMC: 9801066. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.938608.