» Articles » PMID: 30705836

Damage Control Orthopaedics: State of the Art

Overview
Journal World J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Feb 2
PMID 30705836
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Damage control orthopaedics (DCO) originally consisted of the provisional immobilisation of long bone - mainly femur - fractures in order to achieve the advantages of early treatment and to minimise the risk of complications, such as major pain, fat embolism, clotting, pathological inflammatory response, severe haemorrhage triggering the lethal triad, and the traumatic effects of major surgery on a patient who is already traumatised (the "second hit" effect). In recent years, new locations have been added to the DCO concept, such as injuries to the pelvis, spine and upper limbs. Nonetheless, this concept has not yet been validated in well-designed prospective studies, and much controversy remains. Indeed, some researchers believe the indiscriminate application of DCO might be harmful and produce substantial and unnecessary expense. In this respect, too, normalised parameters associated with the acid-base system have been proposed, under a concept termed early appropriate care, in the view that this would enable patients to receive major surgical procedures in an approach offering the advantages of early total care together with the apparent safety of DCO. This paper discusses the diagnosis and treatment of severely traumatised patients managed in accordance with DCO and highlights the possible drawbacks of this treatment principle.

Citing Articles

External Fixators as a Tool for Damage Control Orthopedics in Severely Injured or Polytrauma Patients.

Kountouri I, Christidis P, Christidis G, Biniaris G, Gougoulias N Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69255.

PMID: 39398797 PMC: 11470837. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69255.


Quality of life of survivors following road traffic orthopaedic injuries in Rwanda.

Ingabire J, Tumusiime D, Sagahutu J, Urimubenshi G, Bucyibaruta G, Pilusa S Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1405697.

PMID: 39100955 PMC: 11295000. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1405697.


A case of damage control after polytrauma and bilateral femur fracture.

Avraham D, Herman A, Oulianski M Trauma Case Rep. 2024; 52:101037.

PMID: 38883269 PMC: 11176921. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101037.


Multiple Spinal Epidural Abscesses with Concomitant Multifocal Systemic Abscesses and Multi-joint Septic Arthritis:, A Case Report.

Yang C, Gnanam A, Tat J, Youheng O J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(5):6-12.

PMID: 38784864 PMC: 11111226. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i05.4414.


Immediate management of a stable patient with unstable pelvis.

Cano J, Bogallo J, Ramirez A, Guerado E EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(5):434-447.

PMID: 38726989 PMC: 11099580. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0055.


References
1.
Scalea T, BOSWELL S, Scott J, Mitchell K, KRAMER M, Pollak A . External fixation as a bridge to intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femur fractures: damage control orthopedics. J Trauma. 2000; 48(4):613-21; discussion 621-3. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00006. View

2.
Croce M, Bee T, Pritchard E, Miller P, Fabian T . Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist?. Ann Surg. 2001; 233(6):851-8. PMC: 1421329. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200106000-00016. View

3.
Velmahos G, Toutouzas K, Sarkisyan G, Chan L, Jindal A, Karaiskakis M . Severe trauma is not an excuse for prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Surg. 2002; 137(5):537-41; discussion 541-2. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.5.537. View

4.
Velmahos G, Jindal A, Chan L, Kritikos E, Vassiliu P, Berne T . Prophylactic antibiotics after severe trauma: more is not better. Int Surg. 2002; 86(3):176-83. View

5.
Pape H, Giannoudis P, Krettek C . The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgery. Am J Surg. 2002; 183(6):622-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00865-6. View