» Articles » PMID: 30700669

Working Time Society Consensus Statements: Circadian Time Structure Impacts Vulnerability to Xenobiotics-relevance to Industrial Toxicology and Nonstandard Work Schedules

Overview
Journal Ind Health
Date 2019 Feb 1
PMID 30700669
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The circadian time structure (CTS) has long been the subject of research in occupational medicine, but not to industrial toxicology, including methods of setting threshold limit values (TLVs) and employee biological monitoring. Numerous animal and human investigations document vulnerability to chemical, contagion, and other xenobiotics varies according to the circadian time of encounter. Permanent and rotating nightshift personnel are exposed to industrial contaminants in the same or higher concentration as dayshift personnel, and because of incomplete CTS adjustment to night work, contact with contaminants occurs during a different biological time than day workers. Thus, the amount of protection afforded by certain TLVs, especially for employees of high-risk settings who work night and other nonstandard shift schedules, might be inadequate. The CTS seems additionally germane to procedures of employee biological monitoring in that high-amplitude 24 h rhythms in biomarkers indicative of xenobiotic exposure may result in misjudgment of health risks when data are not gathered in sufficient frequency over time and properly interpreted. Biological reference values time-qualified for their rhythmic variation, currently of interest to laboratory medicine practice, are seemingly important to industrial medicine as circadian time and work-shift specific biological exposure indices to improve surveillance of personnel, particularly those working nonstandard shift schedules.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Shift Work on Occupational Health Indicators among Professionally Active Adults: A Comparative Study.

Pereira H, Feher G, Tibold A, Monteiro S, Costa V, Esgalhado G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21).

PMID: 34769807 PMC: 8583436. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111290.


Important Difference between Occupational Hazard Exposure among Shift Workers and Other Workers; Comparing Workplace before and after 1980.

Miguet M, Rukh G, Titova O, Schioth H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(20).

PMID: 33076288 PMC: 7602472. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207495.


International consensus statements on non-standard working time arrangements and occupational health and safety.

Wong I, Dawson D, Van Dongen H Ind Health. 2019; 57(2):135-138.

PMID: 30930407 PMC: 6449635. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.57_202.

References
1.
Schreiber D, Wessel H, Musil A . Brain tumour induction by methylnitrosourea. Influence of the circadian rhythm on tumour induction by nitrosourea. Neuropatol Pol. 1977; 15(1):137-44. View

2.
Maliszewska J, Piechowicz B, Maciaga G, Zareba L, Marcinkowska S . Pyrethroid residue dynamics in insects depends on the circadian clock. J Environ Sci Health B. 2018; 53(7):441-446. DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2018.1439336. View

3.
Miller R, Martinson K, Sothern R, Durgan B, Gunsolus J . Circadian response of annual weeds in a natural setting to high and low application rates of four herbicides with different modes of actions. Chronobiol Int. 2003; 20(2):299-324. DOI: 10.1081/cbi-120019344. View

4.
Hawkins R, Kripke D, Janowsky D . Circadian rhythm of lithium toxicity in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978; 56(1):113-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00571418. View

5.
Stevens R . Circadian disruption and health: Shift work as a harbinger of the toll taken by electric lighting. Chronobiol Int. 2016; 33(6):589-94. DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2016.1167732. View