» Articles » PMID: 30699314

Bilateral Versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years

Abstract

Background: Multiple arterial grafts may result in longer survival than single arterial grafts after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We evaluated the use of bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafts for CABG.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients scheduled for CABG to undergo bilateral or single internal-thoracic-artery grafting. Additional arterial or vein grafts were used as indicated. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 10 years. The composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was a secondary outcome.

Results: A total of 1548 patients were randomly assigned to undergo bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the bilateral-graft group) and 1554 to undergo single internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the single-graft group). In the bilateral-graft group, 13.9% of the patients received only a single internal-thoracic-artery graft, and in the single-graft group, 21.8% of the patients also received a radial-artery graft. Vital status was not known for 2.3% of the patients at 10 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 10 years, there were 315 deaths (20.3% of the patients) in the bilateral-graft group and 329 deaths (21.2%) in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.12; P=0.62). Regarding the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, there were 385 patients (24.9%) with an event in the bilateral-graft group and 425 patients (27.3%) with an event in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.03).

Conclusions: Among patients who were scheduled for CABG and had been randomly assigned to undergo bilateral or single internal-thoracic-artery grafting, there was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death from any cause at 10 years in the intention-to-treat analysis. Further studies are needed to determine whether multiple arterial grafts provide better outcomes than a single internal-thoracic-artery graft. (Funded by the British Heath Foundation and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN46552265 .).

Citing Articles

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy: Setup, results, and evolution of a new surgical procedure.

Verevkin A, Dashkevich A, Gadelkarim I, Shaqu R, Otto W, Sgouropoulou S JTCVS Tech. 2025; 29:28-39.

PMID: 39991281 PMC: 11845358. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.10.022.


The Saphenous Vein Graft: Can a Frog Become a Princess?.

Calafiore A, Prapas S, Condello I, Katsavrias K, Nasso G, Gaudino M Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768797 PMC: 11676900. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121915.


'No-touch' or 'soft-touch' vein graft harvesting for CABG.

Taggart D Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024; 41(1):4-6.

PMID: 39679082 PMC: 11638423. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-024-01846-y.


Improvement of the outcome of the saphenous vein graft when connected to the internal thoracic artery.

Katsavrias K, Prapas S, Calafiore A, Taggart D, Angouras D, Iliopoulos D Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1478166.

PMID: 39494236 PMC: 11527685. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1478166.


Procedural risk factors for deep and organ/space surgical site infection post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Pearl A, Gordon P, Feeser B, Pepe D, Mehrotra P, Wright S Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024; 4(1):e120.

PMID: 39257421 PMC: 11384151. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.374.