» Articles » PMID: 30694799

Is Endocan a Biochemical Marker for Asymptomatic Target Organ Damage in Hypertensive Patients?

Overview
Publisher Kare Publishing
Date 2019 Jan 30
PMID 30694799
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Identification of the asymptomatic target organ damage (AOD) helps to stratify the overall risk of cardiovascular (CV) diseases and guides a treatment decision in hypertensive patients without a symptomatic CV or renal disease. The endothelial-cell-specific molecule 1 (endocan) is regarded as a novel marker of endothelial dysfunction. Its release is increased in hypertensive patients, especially those with symptomatic CV and renal disease. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the endocan levels in asymptomatic hypertensive patients with or without AOD.

Methods: The study included 132 asymptomatic hypertensive patients, and 101 of who had at least one AOD.

Results: Serum endocan levels did not differ between patients with and without AOD (3.81±0.78 vs. 3.83±0.63 ng/mL, p=0.88). An analysis according to the presence of any specific AOD did not show any difference between groups. No significant correlation was found between serum endocan levels and any of the continuous variables related to AOD, such as the pulse pressure, carotid intimae-media thickness, cardio-ankle vascular index, ankle-brachial index, left ventricular mass index, Sokolow-Lyon index, Cornell voltage-duration product, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Conclusion: Endocan may not serve as a useful biomarker at asymptomatic vascular stages of hypertension, despite its role in indicating disease severity and inflammatory activation in advanced symptomatic CV and renal disease.

Citing Articles

Endocan as a marker of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Behnoush A, Khalaji A, Bahiraie P, Alehossein P, Shobeiri P, Peisepar M Hypertens Res. 2023; 46(10):2388-2399.

PMID: 37580451 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01402-y.


The Role of Endocan in Cardiometabolic Disorders.

Klisic A, Patoulias D Metabolites. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37233681 PMC: 10224119. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13050640.


From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Statescu C, Anghel L, Tudurachi B, Leonte A, Benchea L, Sascau R Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(16).

PMID: 36012430 PMC: 9409468. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169168.

References
1.
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R . Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360(9349):1903-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8. View

2.
Hallan S, Asberg A, Lindberg M, Johnsen H . Validation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula for estimating GFR with special emphasis on calibration of the serum creatinine assay. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 44(1):84-93. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.027. View

3.
Lang R, Bierig M, Devereux R, Flachskampf F, Foster E, Pellikka P . Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006; 7(2):79-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.12.014. View

4.
Sehestedt T, Jeppesen J, Hansen T, Wachtell K, Ibsen H, Torp-Pedersen C . Risk prediction is improved by adding markers of subclinical organ damage to SCORE. Eur Heart J. 2009; 31(7):883-91. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp546. View

5.
Shirai K, Hiruta N, Song M, Kurosu T, Suzuki J, Tomaru T . Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a novel indicator of arterial stiffness: theory, evidence and perspectives. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011; 18(11):924-38. DOI: 10.5551/jat.7716. View