» Articles » PMID: 30692746

Multifaceted Assessment of Dentine Hypersensitivity, Evaluation of Demographic Prevalence Along with Associated Factors: A Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Date 2019 Jan 30
PMID 30692746
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is a relatively common problem which may affect the adult population. The etiology remains multi-factorial with interactions between stimulus and pre-disposing factors causing its aggravation.

Aim: To study the prevalence of DH and associated factors and also to find the association between various factors and DH.

Materials And Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out and a total of 5091 patients, both male and females, were evaluated through questionnaire. Out of the total only 1400 patients were included in the study and were further evaluated clinically. A complete demographic data was obtained and the DH was confirmed by the use of air -water jet of the dental chair and scratching the suspected tooth with a dental probe. The pain response of the subject was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). The data obtained was statistically evaluated and Chi-square test was applied for comparison of different demographic factors with DH.

Results: The overall prevalence of DH was 27.4%. Various demographic factors were found to affect DH such as age, gender, education, and diet. The most common stimulus was found to be cold (21.4%) and common predisposing factor was gingival recession and attrition (28.6%). Clinical examination yielded a statistically significant association between VAS and VRS scores for DH and demographic factors.

Conclusion: The prevalence of DH in present study was 27.4% which is attributed to gingival recession as predisposing factor and cold stimuli as the precipitating factor.

Citing Articles

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the dentin hypersensitivity experience questionnaire short form (DHEQ-15).

Ayan G, Misilli T, Buldur M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1450.

PMID: 39609766 PMC: 11603927. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05235-0.


Late Post-Operative Occurrence of Dentin Hypersensitivity in Adult Patients Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-A Preliminary Report.

Boguslawska-Kapala A, Kochanska B, Rusyan E, Basak G, Struzycka I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16).

PMID: 34444506 PMC: 8391522. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168761.


Effectiveness of diode laser and fluoride on dentin hypersensitivity treatment: A randomized single-blinded clinical trial.

Pantuzzo E, Cunha F, Abreu L, Esteves Lima R J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020; 24(3):259-263.

PMID: 32773977 PMC: 7307464. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_478_19.


Evaluate Efficacy of Desensitizing Toothpaste Containing Zinc-carbonate Hydroxyapatite Nanocrystals: Non-comparative Eight-week Clinical Study.

Al Asmari D, Khan M J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020; 9(6):566-570.

PMID: 32039076 PMC: 6905321. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_261_19.

References
1.
Rees J . The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27(11):860-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027011860.x. View

2.
Gillam D, Seo H, Newman H, Bulman J . Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28(1):20-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00631.x. View

3.
Taani S, Awartani F . Clinical evaluation of cervical dentin sensitivity (CDS) in patients attending general dental clinics (GDC) and periodontal specialty clinics (PSC). J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29(2):118-22. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290205.x. View

4.
Rees J, Addy M . A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29(11):997-1003. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291104.x. View

5.
. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003; 69(4):221-6. View