» Articles » PMID: 30687028

What Can Computational Models Contribute to Neuroimaging Data Analytics?

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Jan 29
PMID 30687028
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past years, nonlinear dynamical models have significantly contributed to the general understanding of brain activity as well as brain disorders. Appropriately validated and optimized mathematical models can be used to mechanistically explain properties of brain structure and neuronal dynamics observed from neuroimaging data. A thorough exploration of the model parameter space and hypothesis testing with the methods of nonlinear dynamical systems and statistical physics can assist in classification and prediction of brain states. On the one hand, such a detailed investigation and systematic parameter variation are hardly feasible in experiments and data analysis. On the other hand, the model-based approach can establish a link between empirically discovered phenomena and more abstract concepts of attractors, multistability, bifurcations, synchronization, noise-induced dynamics, etc. Such a mathematical description allows to compare and differentiate brain structure and dynamics in health and disease, such that model parameters and dynamical regimes may serve as additional biomarkers of brain states and behavioral modes. In this perspective paper we first provide very brief overview of the recent progress and some open problems in neuroimaging data analytics with emphasis on the resting state brain activity. We then focus on a few recent contributions of mathematical modeling to our understanding of the brain dynamics and model-based approaches in medicine. Finally, we discuss the question stated in the title. We conclude that incorporating computational models in neuroimaging data analytics as well as in translational medicine could significantly contribute to the progress in these fields.

Citing Articles

Simulated brain networks reflecting progression of Parkinson's disease.

Jung K, Eickhoff S, Caspers J, Popovych O Netw Neurosci. 2024; 8(4):1400-1420.

PMID: 39735513 PMC: 11675161. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00406.


Adolescent maturation of cortical excitation-inhibition balance based on individualized biophysical network modeling.

Saberi A, Wischnewski K, Jung K, Lotter L, Schaare H, Banaschewski T bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38948771 PMC: 11213014. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.18.599509.


An exploratory computational analysis in mice brain networks of widespread epileptic seizure onset locations along with potential strategies for effective intervention and propagation control.

Courson J, Quoy M, Timofeeva Y, Manos T Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1360009.

PMID: 38468870 PMC: 10925689. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1360009.


Modeling brain network flexibility in networks of coupled oscillators: a feasibility study.

Chinichian N, Lindner M, Yanchuk S, Schwalger T, Scholl E, Berner R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5713.

PMID: 38459077 PMC: 10923875. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55753-8.


Enhanced simulations of whole-brain dynamics using hybrid resting-state structural connectomes.

Manos T, Diaz-Pier S, Fortel I, Driscoll I, Zhan L, Leow A Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 17:1295395.

PMID: 38188355 PMC: 10770256. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1295395.


References
1.
Horwitz B, Friston K, Taylor J . Neural modeling and functional brain imaging: an overview. Neural Netw. 2001; 13(8-9):829-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00062-9. View

2.
Tass P . A model of desynchronizing deep brain stimulation with a demand-controlled coordinated reset of neural subpopulations. Biol Cybern. 2003; 89(2):81-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-003-0425-7. View

3.
Friston K, Harrison L, Penny W . Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(4):1273-302. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7. View

4.
Rosenblum M, Pikovsky A . Delayed feedback control of collective synchrony: an approach to suppression of pathological brain rhythms. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004; 70(4 Pt 1):041904. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.041904. View

5.
Popovych O, Hauptmann C, Tass P . Effective desynchronization by nonlinear delayed feedback. Phys Rev Lett. 2005; 94(16):164102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.164102. View