» Articles » PMID: 30686711

Fatigue Performance of Adhesively Cemented Glass-, Hybrid- and Resin-ceramic Materials for CAD/CAM Monolithic Restorations

Overview
Journal Dent Mater
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2019 Jan 29
PMID 30686711
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the fatigue failure load, number of cycles until failure, and survival probability of adhesively cemented materials with different microstructures (glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic) used to manufacture CAD/CAM monolithic restorations.

Methods: Disc-shaped specimens (n=15; Ø=10mm; thickness=1.0mm) were produced from CAD/CAM blocks as follows: feldspathic (FEL); leucite (LEU); lithium disilicate (LD); zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZRLS); polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN); and resin nanoceramic (RNC). Adhesive cementation was performed onto epoxy discs (dentin analogue- Ø=10mm; thickness=2.5mm). The cemented assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (400N-2200N; step-size of 200N; 10,000 cycles per step; 1.4Hz). Fatigue data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox (log-rank) tests (p<0.05) and Weibull statistical analysis. Fractographic analysis was also performed.

Results: All RNC specimens survived the fatigue test (100% probability of survival at 2200N; 100,000 cycles) and presented occlusal deformation in response to loading, while all other tested materials failed in distinct loading steps with radial cracks starting from the bonding surface. LD (1146.7N; 47,333) and ZRLS (1013.3N; 40,666) materials obtained the highest fatigue failure loads and cycles until failure, meanwhile all PICN specimens failed during the first step (0% probability of survival at 400N; 10,000). FEL had similar Weibull modulus to LD and ZRLS and higher than LEU for both load and number of cycles outcomes.

Significance: The microstructure of adhesively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials influence their response during fatigue testing, which aids in suggesting the best clinical indications.

Citing Articles

Evaluating fatigue resistance in occlusal veneers: a comparative study of processing techniques and material thickness of lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press vs. IPS e.max CAD).

Charoenporn W, Sornsuwan T, Sae-Lee D, Amornvit P, Chaijareenont P, Rungsiyakull P BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1542.

PMID: 39716117 PMC: 11665127. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05347-7.


Mechanical, Adhesive and Surface Properties of a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate CAD/CAM Ceramic Exposed to Different Etching Protocols.

Murillo-Gomez F, Hernandez-Viquez J, Sauma-Montes de Oca J, Vargas-Vargas C, Gonzalez-Vargas N, Vega-Baudrit J Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(20).

PMID: 39459744 PMC: 11509709. DOI: 10.3390/ma17205039.


The impact of inorganic fillers, organic content, and polymerization mode on the degree of conversion of monomers in resin-matrix cements for restorative dentistry: a scoping review.

Santos M, Fidalgo-Pereira R, Torres O, Carvalho O, Henriques B, Ozcan M Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(8):454.

PMID: 39066793 PMC: 11283416. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05829-6.


Effect of surface treatment strategies on bond strength of additively and subtractively manufactured hybrid materials for permanent crowns.

Mao Z, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Yassine J, Hey J, Prause E Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(7):371.

PMID: 38869697 PMC: 11176235. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05767-3.


Biological evaluation of indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located proximal margins following deep margin elevation versus surgical crown lengthening: a randomized controlled trial.

Farouk A, Hassanein O, Fahmy O, Elkady A, ElNahass H Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):24.

PMID: 38147139 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z.