Neurological Recovery Pattern in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy After Anterior Surgery: A Prospective Study with Literature Review

Overview

Journal Asian Spine J

Date 2019 Jan 29

PMID 30685954

Citations 13

Authors

Naveen Pandita

Sanjeev Gupta

Prince Raina

Abhishek Srivastava

Aamir Yaqoob Hakak

Omeshwar Singh

Mohd Azhar-Ud-Din Darokhan

Mohd Farooq Butt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective clinical study.

Purpose: The present study aimed to examine the neurological recovery pattern in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after anterior cervical decompression and compare it with the existing reports in the literature.

Overview Of Literature: Neurological recovery and regression of myelopathy symptoms is an important factor that determines the outcomes of surgical decompression. The present findings contribute to the literature on the pattern of neurological recovery and patient prognosis with respect to the resolution of myelopathy symptoms after surgery.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted in Government Medical College in Jammu, North India between November 2012 and October 2014, a total of 30 consecutive patients with CSM were included and treated with anterior decompression and stabilization. They were prospectively followed up for 1 year and were evaluated for their neurological recovery pattern. The postoperative outcome was evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score. The recovery rate was calculated using Hirabayashi's method. The JOA score was assessed before the operation and postoperatively at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

Results: The postoperative mJOA score was 0 in the 1st month, 12.90±3.57 in the 3rd month, 13.50±3.55 in the 4th month, 14.63±3.62 in the 6th month, and 14.9±3.24 at the final follow-up of 1 year. The average recovery rate during the 1st month followup was 0%, and that during the 3rd month follow-up was 12.91% with a range of 0%-50%. The average recovery rate during the 4th month was 32.5%, with a range of 0%-60%, while that during the 6th month was 72.83%, with a range of 0%-100%. The average recovery rate during the final follow-up of 1 year was 54.3%.

Conclusions: Neurological recovery after surgical decompression starts from the 3rd postoperative month and progresses until the 6th postoperative month; thereafter, it gradually plateaus over the subsequent 6 months until it steadies. Symptom duration is an important factor that requires consideration while determining postoperative neurological recovery.

Citing Articles

1-year data on patient-reported outcome is enough after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cohort study from the Swedish Spine register.

Gerdhem L, MacDowall A, Gerdhem P Acta Orthop. 2025; 96():26-32.

PMID: 39786205 PMC: 11714782. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42630.

Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty for Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Correlation Between Spinal Canal Expansion and Clinical Outcomes.

Ko Y, Kim Y, Barraza J, Ko M, Bang C, Hwang B J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598048 PMC: 11595153. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226904.

Tract-specific magnetization transfer ratio provides insights into the severity of degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Haynes G, Muhammad F, Weber 2nd K, Khan A, Hameed S, Shakir H Spinal Cord. 2024; 62(12):700-707.

PMID: 39354176 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-024-01036-y.

Analysis of risk factors affecting postoperative neurological recovery in patients with cervical spine fracture in ankylosing spondylitis.

Wang C, Li Y, Wang L, Wang Y, Gao Z, Lu X Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(32):e39232.

PMID: 39121249 PMC: 11315538. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039232.

Does Elevated Mean-Arterial Pressure Lead to Better Outcomes in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?- A Prospective, Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

Sharma A, Jaiswal A, Marathe N, Singh V, Shakya A, Mangale N Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241256350.

PMID: 38798232 PMC: 11571445. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241256350.

References

Chiles 3rd B, Leonard M, Choudhri H, Cooper P . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery. 1999; 44(4):762-9; discussion 769-70. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199904000-00041. View

Matsumoto M, Toyama Y, Ishikawa M, Chiba K, Suzuki N, Fujimura Y . Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict the outcome of conservative treatment?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(6):677-82. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00005. View

Edwards 2nd C, Heller J, Silcox 3rd D . T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(14):1788-94. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00009. View

Kadanka Z, Bednarik J, Vohanka S, Vlach O, Stejskal L, Chaloupka R . Conservative treatment versus surgery in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomised study. Eur Spine J. 2001; 9(6):538-44. PMC: 3611417. DOI: 10.1007/s005860000132. View

Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y . Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and mri of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(11):1238-45. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200106010-00012. View

Chen C, Lyu R, Lee S, Wong Y, Wang L . Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with type of intensity. Radiology. 2001; 221(3):789-94. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2213010365. View

Fouyas I, Statham P, Sandercock P . Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(7):736-47. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200204010-00011. View

Geck M, Eismont F . Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002; 33(2):329-48. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00002-0. View

Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednanik J, Smrcka V, Krbec M, Stejskal L . Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(20):2205-10; discussion 2210-1. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000029255.77224.BB. View

10.

Chung S, Lee C, Chung K . Factors affecting the surgical results of expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Int Orthop. 2002; 26(6):334-8. PMC: 3620971. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-002-0372-2. View

11.

Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Yamazaki A . Effects of surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients > or = 70 years of age: a retrospective comparative study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002; 15(6):458-60. DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200212000-00004. View

12.

Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Sato H, Uemura K, Tsukada A, Nose T . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences. Neurosurgery. 2002; 52(1):122-6; discussion 126. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200301000-00015. View

13.

Lees F, Turner J . NATURAL HISTORY AND PROGNOSIS OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. Br Med J. 1963; 2(5373):1607-10. PMC: 1873933. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5373.1607. View

14.

Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K . Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(11):1281-4. View

15.

Prabhu K, Babu K, Samuel S, Chacko A . Rapid opening and closing of the hand as a measure of early neurologic recovery in the upper extremity after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(1):105-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.037. View

16.

Cheung W, Arvinte D, Wong Y, Luk K, Cheung K . Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy - a prospective study. Int Orthop. 2007; 32(2):273-8. PMC: 2269013. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0315-4. View

17.

Acharya S, Srivastava A, Virmani S, Tandon R . Resolution of physical signs and recovery in severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(21):E1083-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df1a8e. View

18.

Kabir S, Alabi J, Rezajooi K, Casey A . Anterior cervical corpectomy: review and comparison of results using titanium mesh cages and carbon fibre reinforced polymer cages. Br J Neurosurg. 2010; 24(5):542-6. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2010.503819. View

19.

Kang Y, Lee J, Koh Y, Hur S, Kim S, Chai J . New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(1):W134-40. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5560. View

20.

Lebl D, Hughes A, Cammisa Jr F, OLeary P . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. HSS J. 2012; 7(2):170-8. PMC: 3145857. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-011-9208-1. View