» Articles » PMID: 30682805

Biological Performance of Electrospun Polymer Fibres

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Jan 27
PMID 30682805
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evaluation of biological responses to polymeric scaffolds are important, given that the ideal scaffold should be biocompatible, biodegradable, promote cell adhesion and aid cell proliferation. The primary goal of this research was to measure the biological responses of cells against various polymeric and collagen electrospun scaffolds (polycaprolactone (PCL) and polylactic acid (PLA) polymers: PCL⁻drug, PCL⁻collagen⁻drug, PLA⁻drug and PLA⁻collagen⁻drug); cell proliferation was measured with a cell adhesion assay and cell viability using 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and resazurin assays. The results demonstrated that there is a distinct lack of growth of cells against any irgasan (IRG) loaded scaffolds and far greater adhesion of cells against levofloxacin (LEVO) loaded scaffolds. Fourteen-day studies revealed a significant increase in cell growth after a 7-day period. The addition of collagen in the formulations did not promote greater cell adhesion. Cell viability studies revealed the levels of IRG used in scaffolds were toxic to cells, with the concentration used 475 times higher than the EC value for IRG. It was concluded that the negatively charged carboxylic acid group found in LEVO is attracting positively charged fibronectin, which in turn is attracting the cell to adhere to the adsorbed proteins on the surface of the scaffold. Overall, the biological studies examined in this paper are valuable as preliminary data for potential further studies into more complex aspects of cell behaviour with polymeric scaffolds.

Citing Articles

Leukopenia, weight loss and oral mucositis induced by 5-Fluorouracil in hamsters' model: A regenerative approach using electrospun poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid) membrane.

Chor A, Dutra H, Dias M, Goncalves R, Takiya C, Rossi A Oncotarget. 2025; 16:103-117.

PMID: 39969203 PMC: 11837862. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28685.


Controlling Mechanical Properties of Medical-Grade Scaffolds through Electrospinning Parameter Selection.

Culbreath C, McCullen S, Mefford O ACS Omega. 2024; 9(35):36982-36992.

PMID: 39246470 PMC: 11375708. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01864.


Characterization of Electrospun BDMC-Loaded PLA Nanofibers with Drug Delivery Function and Anti-Inflammatory Activity.

Morillo-Bargues M, Osorno A, Guerri C, Monleon Pradas M, Martinez-Ramos C Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(12).

PMID: 37373487 PMC: 10299173. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210340.


Diversity Models and Applications of 3D Breast Tumor-on-a-Chip.

Song K, Zu X, Du Z, Hu Z, Wang J, Li J Micromachines (Basel). 2021; 12(7).

PMID: 34357224 PMC: 8306159. DOI: 10.3390/mi12070814.


Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Based on Electrospun Biomimetic Scaffold Mediated Endothelial Differentiation Facilitating Regeneration and Repair of Abdominal Wall Defects HIF-1α/VEGF Pathway.

Dong W, Song Z, Liu S, Yu P, Shen Z, Yang J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:676409.

PMID: 34307320 PMC: 8293919. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.676409.


References
1.
Masuda T, Ohmi K, Yamaguchi H, Hasegawa K, Sugiyama T, Matsuda Y . Growing and differentiating characterization of aortic smooth muscle cell line, p53LMAC01 obtained from p53 knock out mice. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999; 190(1-2):99-104. View

2.
Robinson A, Belden J, Lydy M . Toxicity of fluoroquinolone antibiotics to aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005; 24(2):423-30. DOI: 10.1897/04-210r.1. View

3.
Christman K, Lee R . Biomaterials for the treatment of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(5):907-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.005. View

4.
Andrade C, Wong A, Waddell T, Keshavjee S, Liu M . Cell-based tissue engineering for lung regeneration. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006; 292(2):L510-8. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00175.2006. View

5.
Chen M, Patra P, Warner S, Bhowmick S . Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2007; 13(3):579-87. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.0205. View