» Articles » PMID: 30681719

Predicting Asymptomatic Cervical Dilation in Pregnant Patients with Short Mid-trimester Cervical Length: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Jan 26
PMID 30681719
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Second trimester asymptomatic cervical dilation is a significant risk factor for early preterm birth. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether transvaginal ultrasound cervical length (CL) predicts asymptomatic cervical dilation on physical exam in women with short cervix (CL ≤25 mm) and no prior preterm birth.

Material And Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial on pessary in asymptomatic singletons without prior preterm birth diagnosed with CL ≤25 mm between 18 and 23  weeks. Participants had transvaginal ultrasound and physical cervical exam and were randomized to pessary or no pessary with all patients with cervical length ≤20 mm offered vaginal progesterone. The primary outcome was to determine whether CL was predictive of asymptomatic physical cervical dilation ≥1 cm using receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: In all, 119 women were included. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve, CL ≤11 mm was best predictive of cervical dilation ≥1 cm, with 75% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and area under the curve 0.73 (0.55-0.91), P = 0.009. Cervical length ≤11 mm had increased incidence of cervical dilation ≥1 cm on physical exam (30% vs 3%, odds ratio 12.29 (3.05-49.37) P < 0.001) with a negative predictive value of 97%. Patients with ≥1 cm dilation had increased preterm birth <37 weeks (75% vs 39%, P = 0.03) compared to those not dilated. Women with a CL ≤11 mm had increased preterm birth <37 weeks (77% vs 31%, P < 0.001), preterm birth <34 weeks (63% vs 22%, P < 0.001), and lower birthweight (1552 ± 1047 vs 2560 ± 1072 g, P < 0.001) compared to women with CL >11 mm.

Conclusions: Among singletons without prior preterm birth diagnosed with short cervix (≤25 mm), CL ≤11 mm may identify a subgroup of patients at high risk for asymptomatic cervical dilation and poor perinatal outcome. Physical exam should be considered and adjunctive preterm birth prevention measures should be studied in singletons with CL ≤11 mm.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated with Spontaneous Preterm Birth after Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage.

Lee K, Yun S, Park S, Kim K, Lee K, Lee J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38138905 PMC: 10744759. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121678.


The use of cervical cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervical shortening or dilation: a twelve-year retrospective cohort study.

Tan H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):700.

PMID: 37773110 PMC: 10540472. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06013-6.


Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.

Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban O, Abdel-Aleem M, Mohamed A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 12:CD014508.

PMID: 36453699 PMC: 9713761. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014508.


Characterization of cervical canal and vaginal bacteria in pregnant women with cervical incompetence.

Sun M, Geng H, Bai J, Feng J, Xu N, Liu Y Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:986326.

PMID: 36246259 PMC: 9556877. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.986326.


The clinical value of prenatal assessment of cervical length and placental thickness in pregnant women with placenta previa.

Zheng X, Li T, Zeng M, Cheng X, Rao H Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(5):5308-5314.

PMID: 34150123 PMC: 8205795.


References
1.
. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(4):964-73. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b. View

2.
Orzechowski K, Boelig R, Baxter J, Berghella V . A universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124(3):520-525. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000428. View

3.
Hassan S, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter J, Khandelwal M . Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38(1):18-31. PMC: 3482512. DOI: 10.1002/uog.9017. View

4.
Zlatnik F, Burmeister L . Interval evaluation of the cervix for predicting pregnancy outcome and diagnosing cervical incompetence. J Reprod Med. 1993; 38(5):365-9. View

5.
. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(2 Pt 1):372-379. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc. View